|
|
|
Review Date: Sun March 28, 2004
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
Fabulous taste! I substituted walnuts for almonds and it was delicious! The crumbs leftover could be used as a topping on low-carb ice cream! Yum!
|
|
Lori
Eachday
Registered: May 2003 Location: New York Posts: 20100
|
|
Review Date: Fri December 24, 2004
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
easy
|
|
Cons:
|
they don't look very festive
|
|
I think this was a good, easy recipe. I made it along with other Christmas cookies. They taste wonderful, but the first batch looked kind of blah - I put a half a pecan on the top of each in the second batch and they looke3d much better. Thank goodness there's a good recipe that is LC and doesn't use all those odd kinds of flour.
|
|
Tyl
Way too much time on my hands!
Registered: September 2008 Location: TX Posts: 15000
|
|
Review Date: Sat July 25, 2009
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
super easy
|
|
Cons:
|
i ate the whole thing...
|
|
i burned half of the batch, but the other half was fab. They were very buttery. And quite tastey. Simple.
|
|
lulamc
Senior LCF Member
Registered: April 2009 Posts: 105
|
|
Review Date: Fri December 11, 2009
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
delish - easy to make
|
|
Cons:
|
portion control!
|
|
These cookies were great - I'll make them again when I bake Christmas cookies.
|
|