Stillman's May B Winners at Losing - Page 3

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

ugly muscular formations."

How is that possible!!!!!!!

nermo · 05-01-2010, 12:42 PM

Hey Everyone!

Happy May LOSERS!!!!! hehehe

I am still the same weight but this month I better get outta the 200's!

Al-

Hope you have a great day! DON'T EAT ANY CAKE!!!!

Well I am really tired Have a good night everyone

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 12:50 PM

Hi Nermo!!! Almost didn't recognise you with the new avi!! Nite nite, sleep tite!!!

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nermo

Al-

Hope you have a great day! DON'T EAT ANY CAKE!!!!

Hi Nermo! THX!! The kids and I are making choc brownies with frosting for everyone but me! got em some icecream to throw on the side too. Love love love torture!

IM2fat · 05-01-2010, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getting there!!!

Thanks! We call the toast stuff jam too!!
But then what's the wobbly stuff you put with ice-cream, not the syrup--you make it by melting a chunk of it in boiling water and then letting set in the fridge-we call it jelly.It has flavours like strwbery etc. It's not the clear thing-that's gelatin I think!
Nope didn't know that's what Jello was-thought that's what ye called jam!!!

The wobbly stuff that "sets" in the fridge . . is ususally called Jello (Name Brand) but is actually Gelatin. .It comes in many flavors.. Perhaps others put it with ice cream. . I never have?? I know also put whipped cream on it??

Toast Jam and Jelly. . Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. . Mmmm. .don't get me going. .

IM2fat · 05-01-2010, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getting there!!!

Whaaaaaat?????????????

Wouldn't taht make you eat more because you'd be nice and comfy!!!!!

I think that's the point. . we need to get comfy with our food? IDK. . It just sounded interesting and it was only a buck.. so what the heck?

IM2fat · 05-01-2010, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

You go girl! NOw all you need is a stiff CL in a martini glass and a feather duster!!!

I just had to double check to make sure my on-line camera wasn't on again. . I hate when that happens!

IM2fat · 05-01-2010, 01:18 PM

9 pounds in 9 days? O My. .it would be so awesome if I could do it. .I just realized my anniversary is on the 9th. wouldn't that be cool. .OK. gives me something to strive for.

By the way, Al. . .Happy, Happy, Happy Birthday to you. . I am almost exactly 10 years older than you! Uggg.g.g..gg.ggggggggggggg

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

Hi Nermo! THX!! The kids and I are making choc brownies with frosting for everyone but me! got em some icecream to throw on the side too. Love love love torture!

Oh Al your willpower is amazing!!

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IM2fat

I think that's the point. . we need to get comfy with our food?

Oh I didn't get that!!

ANyway I am comfy...tooo comfy!! Hee!!

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IM2fat

9 pounds in 9 days? O My. .it would be so awesome if I could do it. .I just realized my anniversary is on the 9th. wouldn't that be cool. .OK. gives me something to strive for.

By the way, Al. . .Happy, Happy, Happy Birthday to you. . I am almost exactly 10 years older than you! Uggg.g.g..gg.ggggggggggggg

In years but not spirit!!!

BTW...Stillmans says you CAN lose 9 pounds in 9 days!! That guy is a good liar. But Im almost getting to the part where he goes over QWL in detail again....Im going to read in between the lines to see what we're all doing wrong! Reading the "patient testimony is kinda tickin me off"...

Im also thinking about when I'm not an "overweight" to follow his lead and try "The inches Off". Although I got down pretty low there are definitely areas that buldge out. If his calculations are correct, I may be able to flatten them out!

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 01:51 PM

Yeah he's such a liar!!!!

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getting there!!!

Yeah he's such a liar!!!!

Im really not sure now...He says I need 1200 calories to maintain. (remember, Im sedentary) That number is for "after" the diet. YIKES!! I dont think I have been totally true to this. We should all revisit the rules and go through our menus with a magnifying glass. I am going to give this an honest to goodness, no cheat, shot, and see if I can prove him right.

Now, he says to eat all you want until full. Not stuffed. I am guilty of stuffing myself with loads of meat and for most days, its all day long. I am going to practice more control. (I think Gwn has this good. She eats a little bit throughout the day, tracks her calories, shes not hungry and the calories are always low) I eat way too much. Yeah it still works and eventually I lose, but Im ready to get this done now! So thats that. Cutting portions in half starting.....Monday. ( really want the whole porterhouse to myself...so greedy..I am)

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

So thats that. Cutting portions in half starting.....Monday. ( really want the whole porterhouse to myself...so greedy..I am)

You crack me up, girl!!!!

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:09 PM

Before April my cals were very low-they were averaging about 800--and I lost barely anything!!! I was thinking this time of doing the opposite and upping!! Well ina couple of weeks time!!
He was always really stingy with cals!! What did he say I need?

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:13 PM

More topic for debate::: He says that "Inches Off" pulls the fat from between your muscles. Inches off is a low protein diet (opposite QWL), so wouldnt we be losing muscle mass and thats bad, or is it good because we really are losing extra fat. How does one know for sure....I hate conflicting evidence or theories...

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:14 PM

Yikes I'm just thinking--I read that if you want to lose a pound a week(eh no I want more!) you should lower your cals by 500 a day..so that would mean you should only be eating 700. See he was really mean!!
How could he think you could lose 9lbs a week??? That's like 3500 x 9 (too lazy to calcuate that!) that you'd either have to burn or do without!!! I'm thinking those testimonials are iffy!!!!

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getting there!!!

What did he say I need?

Height please?

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:16 PM

I'll just type it all out for inquiring minds...

5' - 98
5'1 - 100
5'2 - 105
5'3 - 110
5'4 - 115

and keep adding 5 for every inch!

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

More topic for debate::: He says that "Inches Off" pulls the fat from between your muscles. Inches off is a low protein diet (opposite QWL), so wouldnt we be losing muscle mass and thats bad, or is it good because we really are losing extra fat. How does one know for sure....I hate conflicting evidence or theories...

That's exactely what I said!!!!!!!!!!! I so think that's a contradiction. I don't believe it at all. Cos everything about high protein diets say that what you lose is fat and not muscle mass and muscle is what keeps the metabolism up so if you lose muscle then you have to eat less and less.
About it making you smaller-yeah it prob would work if you were a big body builder, but not for normalos!!
I think he should have stuck to one theory!

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:18 PM

5' - 1000
5'1 - 1100
5'2 - 1200
5'3 - 1250
5'4 - 1300

and keep adding 50 for every inch!

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:18 PM

Oh seriously how can it pull the fat from your muscles???? Like how?????

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:22 PM

ok...i have to type this out...

"the inches-off diet pulls fat out from "between" the muscles and reduces muscle mass."

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

I'll just type it all out for inquiring minds...

5' - 98
5'1 - 100
5'2 - 105
5'3 - 110
5'4 - 115

and keep adding 5 for every inch!

What are these? What weight I should be? Yikes! I'm 5'6 and a half--that half is very important--it lets me be 2.5lbs heavier!!!

I should be 125. (even doing those maths were taxing on my brain cell! I kid you not!)Oh! I thought he had much lower weights than that.
I want to be lighter than that.

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:22 PM

just like magic!!!

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

5' - 1000
5'1 - 1100
5'2 - 1200
5'3 - 1250
5'4 - 1300

and keep adding 50 for every inch!

Oh 1400 then. I so wouldn't lose on that!!

Is that to maintain?

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getting there!!!

What are these? What weight I should be? Yikes! I'm 5'6 and a half--that half is very important--it lets me be 2.5lbs heavier!!!

I should be 125. (even doing those maths were taxing on my brain cell! I kid you not!)Oh! I thought he had much lower weights than that.
I want to be lighter than that.

Stillman would burst your bubble and say you shrunk to 5'6. Seriously I read it. He said Im in denial and really 5 feet tall.

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:25 PM

and to be really cruel. He said that only 5% of people are really large framed, but those that are can add 5 pounds.

aleriaaa · 05-01-2010, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getting there!!!

Oh 1400 then. I so wouldn't lose on that!!

Is that to maintain?

To maintain.

Getting there!!! · 05-01-2010, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleriaaa

ok...i have to type this out...

"the inches-off diet pulls fat out from "between" the muscles and reduces muscle mass."

Ok now I'm laughing at the screen!! I meant that!!! But still--how???? I don't get it!!! Well I suppose if you ate nothing but salad then because of the sheer bulk youir cals would be very low so yeah you would lose and become skinny......oh just as I wrote that I think goody!!...no but seriously I def your metabolism would drop big time.So yeah you would get skinny(good) but you'd have to eat much less to not put it back on. Mine is pretty slow at the best of times!!
We need a guinea pig to test it out!!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-01-2010, 12:42 PM	#62
nermo Senior LCF Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 475 Gallery: nermo Stats: 272/198 /180 for now WOE: Stillman Start Date: jan2010	Hey Everyone! Happy May LOSERS!!!!! hehehe I am still the same weight but this month I better get outta the 200's! Al- Hope you have a great day! DON'T EAT ANY CAKE!!!! Well I am really tired Have a good night everyone

05-01-2010, 12:50 PM	#63
Getting there!!! Big Yapper!!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Ireland Posts: 8,148 Gallery: Getting there!!! Stats: 252/116/105 5'6 WOE: Stillmans QWL/Dukan Start Date: 1 November 2008	Hi Nermo!!! Almost didn't recognise you with the new avi!! Nite nite, sleep tite!!!

05-01-2010, 01:18 PM	#68
IM2fat Very Gabby LCF Member!!! Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: The Great Lake State Posts: 4,306 Gallery: IM2fat Stats: 190/182/150/140 WOE: Stillmans / ww pp and stillmans Start Date: July 2009 ! Life changing April 9 2012	9 pounds in 9 days? O My. .it would be so awesome if I could do it. .I just realized my anniversary is on the 9th. wouldn't that be cool. .OK. gives me something to strive for. By the way, Al. . .Happy, Happy, Happy Birthday to you. . I am almost exactly 10 years older than you! Uggg.g.g..gg.ggggggggggggg

05-01-2010, 01:51 PM	#72
Getting there!!! Big Yapper!!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Ireland Posts: 8,148 Gallery: Getting there!!! Stats: 252/116/105 5'6 WOE: Stillmans QWL/Dukan Start Date: 1 November 2008	Yeah he's such a liar!!!!

05-01-2010, 02:09 PM	#75
Getting there!!! Big Yapper!!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Ireland Posts: 8,148 Gallery: Getting there!!! Stats: 252/116/105 5'6 WOE: Stillmans QWL/Dukan Start Date: 1 November 2008	Before April my cals were very low-they were averaging about 800--and I lost barely anything!!! I was thinking this time of doing the opposite and upping!! Well ina couple of weeks time!! He was always really stingy with cals!! What did he say I need?

05-01-2010, 02:13 PM	#76
aleriaaa Blabbermouth!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 6,743 Gallery: aleriaaa Stats: 189/127/110 5'2" WOE: QWL	More topic for debate::: He says that "Inches Off" pulls the fat from between your muscles. Inches off is a low protein diet (opposite QWL), so wouldnt we be losing muscle mass and thats bad, or is it good because we really are losing extra fat. How does one know for sure....I hate conflicting evidence or theories...

05-01-2010, 02:14 PM	#77
Getting there!!! Big Yapper!!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Ireland Posts: 8,148 Gallery: Getting there!!! Stats: 252/116/105 5'6 WOE: Stillmans QWL/Dukan Start Date: 1 November 2008	Yikes I'm just thinking--I read that if you want to lose a pound a week(eh no I want more!) you should lower your cals by 500 a day..so that would mean you should only be eating 700. See he was really mean!! How could he think you could lose 9lbs a week??? That's like 3500 x 9 (too lazy to calcuate that!) that you'd either have to burn or do without!!! I'm thinking those testimonials are iffy!!!!

05-01-2010, 02:16 PM	#79
aleriaaa Blabbermouth!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 6,743 Gallery: aleriaaa Stats: 189/127/110 5'2" WOE: QWL	I'll just type it all out for inquiring minds... 5' - 98 5'1 - 100 5'2 - 105 5'3 - 110 5'4 - 115 and keep adding 5 for every inch!

05-01-2010, 02:18 PM	#81
aleriaaa Blabbermouth!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 6,743 Gallery: aleriaaa Stats: 189/127/110 5'2" WOE: QWL	5' - 1000 5'1 - 1100 5'2 - 1200 5'3 - 1250 5'4 - 1300 and keep adding 50 for every inch!

05-01-2010, 02:22 PM	#83
aleriaaa Blabbermouth!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 6,743 Gallery: aleriaaa Stats: 189/127/110 5'2" WOE: QWL	ok...i have to type this out... "the inches-off diet pulls fat out from "between" the muscles and reduces muscle mass."

05-01-2010, 02:25 PM	#88
aleriaaa Blabbermouth!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 6,743 Gallery: aleriaaa Stats: 189/127/110 5'2" WOE: QWL	and to be really cruel. He said that only 5% of people are really large framed, but those that are can add 5 pounds.