Low Carb Friends  
Netrition.com - Tools - Faces - Recipes - Home


Go Back   Low Carb Friends > Health Support Groups > Cholesterol and Heart Health
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Forum Jump
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2017, 12:48 PM   #1
ilove._.tv
Senior LCF Member
 
ilove._.tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 875
Gallery: ilove._.tv
Stats: 235/224.6
WOE: Low-Carbohydrates
Start Date: 4.2.2017
My doctor wants me to start Cholesterol Meds....

Should I?? Please help. Thank you.

Here are my recent numbers:




Past Results:

ilove._.tv is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 06-12-2017, 12:50 PM   #2
ilove._.tv
Senior LCF Member
 
ilove._.tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 875
Gallery: ilove._.tv
Stats: 235/224.6
WOE: Low-Carbohydrates
Start Date: 4.2.2017
What can I do to improve HDL on my own??
ilove._.tv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2017, 03:22 PM   #3
battler
Senior LCF Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 248
Gallery: battler
Firstly there are so many cardiologists, researchers, doctors that have got blogs on why the cholesterol theory is simply not true. Zoe Harcombe, Malcolm Kendrick, Aseem Maholtra, William Davis, Peter Attia, Jack Kruse, Ronesh Sinha, and thats just a few. Google is definitely your friend when it comes to cholesterol.

The thing they have in common, is that triglycerides are the main issue, and then the only thing that differs is how low they should be, but you will infer the lower the better.

My total cholesterol is 297, but my triglycerides are 70 and my HDL is 90 and based on my own research, I have a very good cholesterol profile and would not take a statin ever. High HDL and low triglycerides means LDL is the large fluffy kind and is healthy and protective. My LDL is 193.

Simply put you need to reduce your triglycerides - what causes high triglycerides - carbs. Saturated fat raises HDL and makes your LDL the good kind.

Do your own research - its very freeing.
battler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2017, 12:45 PM   #4
ilove._.tv
Senior LCF Member
 
ilove._.tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 875
Gallery: ilove._.tv
Stats: 235/224.6
WOE: Low-Carbohydrates
Start Date: 4.2.2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by battler View Post
Firstly there are so many cardiologists, researchers, doctors that have got blogs on why the cholesterol theory is simply not true. Zoe Harcombe, Malcolm Kendrick, Aseem Maholtra, William Davis, Peter Attia, Jack Kruse, Ronesh Sinha, and thats just a few. Google is definitely your friend when it comes to cholesterol.

The thing they have in common, is that triglycerides are the main issue, and then the only thing that differs is how low they should be, but you will infer the lower the better.

My total cholesterol is 297, but my triglycerides are 70 and my HDL is 90 and based on my own research, I have a very good cholesterol profile and would not take a statin ever. High HDL and low triglycerides means LDL is the large fluffy kind and is healthy and protective. My LDL is 193.

Simply put you need to reduce your triglycerides - what causes high triglycerides - carbs. Saturated fat raises HDL and makes your LDL the good kind.

Do your own research - its very freeing.
Your post means everything to me

THANK YOU

I'll do some research over the weekend.

Blessing!
ilove._.tv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 06:14 AM   #5
Leo41
Senior LCF member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,784
Gallery: Leo41
Stats: 340 then/145 now
WOE: Low carb/calorie cycling
I hate to mention this, but I had a VAP test, and my LDL is 100% Pattern A (the large, fluffy kind). My endo said that he sees this in people with high HDL and low trigs (me).

HOWEVER, my cardiologist says that there's no such thing as 'good' LDL. If the number is high, it's an issue, regardless of the type. Yes, Pattern A is better, but it's not 'good.' He says that the idea of 'good' LDL is just a misconception that has been promoted via the internet.

I had found that coconut oil raised my LDL significantly, and both my endo and cardiologist told me to stop using it because any item that can easily raise LDL should be avoided. I've since read that some people have this 'reaction' to CO, so I'm not alone.

Last edited by Leo41; 06-15-2017 at 06:16 AM..
Leo41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2017, 12:41 AM   #6
battler
Senior LCF Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 248
Gallery: battler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo41 View Post

' He says that the idea of 'good' LDL is just a misconception that has been promoted via the internet.
There is lots of rubbish on the internet along with a lot of well thought out and well researched information.

The idea that good LDL is a misconception based on that fact its published via the internet is not rational. This is what dieticians who are sponsored by big sugar say. No objection to the different view, but debate the data not the publishing mechanism.

I would just ask myslef, if no LDL is good, then why does your body make it?

Last edited by battler; 06-16-2017 at 12:48 AM..
battler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2017, 03:29 AM   #7
Leo41
Senior LCF member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,784
Gallery: Leo41
Stats: 340 then/145 now
WOE: Low carb/calorie cycling
I didn't say that 'no LDL' is good; just that a high LDL isn't 'good' regardless of particle size.

I mentioned the internet because that's where I see constant mentions of 'good LDL' because of particle size. I have never seen that with scientific references as support. Yes, 'large, fluffy' may be 'better' to have than 'small, dense,' but that doesn't make high LDL a good thing.

Personally, I don't worry about my cholesterol; I was just reporting what my cardiologist told me.
Leo41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2017, 09:05 PM   #8
battler
Senior LCF Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 248
Gallery: battler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo41 View Post
I didn't say that 'no LDL' is good; just that a high LDL isn't 'good' regardless of particle size.

I mentioned the internet because that's where I see constant mentions of 'good LDL' because of particle size. I have never seen that with scientific references as support. Yes, 'large, fluffy' may be 'better' to have than 'small, dense,' but that doesn't make high LDL a good thing.

Personally, I don't worry about my cholesterol; I was just reporting what my cardiologist told me.
Nor do I. I accept I am eating whole foods and that all fats have saturated and unsaturated fats combined. I do agree with you that there are limited scientific references, but this is not something that big sugar or big pharma is going to fund, so the people speaking this view can only use data that has been collected. I also accept they cannot be expected to market their science in the way that organisations like pharmaceuticals coys, kellogs etc. The only reason heart associations around the world can do big marketing is because they are funded by big corporations. The cardiologists speaking against the logic are largely on their own.
battler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 05:07 AM   #9
Leo41
Senior LCF member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,784
Gallery: Leo41
Stats: 340 then/145 now
WOE: Low carb/calorie cycling
You are right about the cardiologists. I get an annual check up, and my cardio is a great guy--and very knowledgable. On my last visit, I brought him an article I'd found (science/medical) about how a ketogenic WOE is 'good' for the heart, and cholesterol numbers need to be considered differently for anyone who is regularly in ketosis.

He looked it over, smiled, and said, "But you need to understand that I am only able to recommend what is approved by the AHA." He went on to explain that doctors make themselves vulnerable to charges of malpractice and/or censure by accrediting agencies if they offer advice that 'differs' from what their agencies approve.

He tacitly agreed with me, and he's never concerned with my cholesterol numbers at all.
Leo41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 09:02 AM   #10
susan46
Senior LCF Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 423
Gallery: susan46
Stats: 256/220.5/150
WOE: High fat, low carb, moderate protein
Start Date: April 2016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo41 View Post
You are right about the cardiologists. I get an annual check up, and my cardio is a great guy--and very knowledgable. On my last visit, I brought him an article I'd found (science/medical) about how a ketogenic WOE is 'good' for the heart, and cholesterol numbers need to be considered differently for anyone who is regularly in ketosis.

He looked it over, smiled, and said, "But you need to understand that I am only able to recommend what is approved by the AHA." He went on to explain that doctors make themselves vulnerable to charges of malpractice and/or censure by accrediting agencies if they offer advice that 'differs' from what their agencies approve.

He tacitly agreed with me, and he's never concerned with my cholesterol numbers at all.
Well, he certainly spoke the truth there. They MUST follow their standard protocols . This means those of us that follow a different path should approach what they say with caution. After all, most doctors still preach the low fat whole grain sermon also, especially cardiologists.

You couldn't pay me to take a statin drug.

JMHO. YMMV.
susan46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Copyright ©1999-2017 Netrition, Inc. All rights reserved. - Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
LowCarbFriends® is a registered mark of Netrition, Inc.