Low Carb Friends  
Netrition.com - Chat - Reviews - Faces - Recipes - eCards - Home


Go Back   Low Carb Friends > Inspiration and Wisdom > Recommended Reading
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2008, 03:56 PM   #1
Blabbermouth!!!
 
fawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 7,447
Gallery: fawn
Stats: 210/120
WOE: Eating For Health
Start Date: 2/2000
Another reason to avoid processed foods

This chaps me.....chemicals messing with our brain chemistry added to foods and approved by the FDA? This really is getting sick. I am on a campaign to to transition as many people as I can to a whole foods lifestyle......

Quote:
'Secretive' Chemicals Being Hidden in Food Under 'Artificial Flavors' Label
(NaturalNews) You Thought MSG Was Bad? At least they admit that it's in there... well, mostly. Have you picked up a can of soup lately and noticed that the sodium levels are lower? Seen a label that said, "No MSG"? How about realizing that there is less sugar on the label of your favorite ice cream? Believe it or not, this is cause for concern.

This article has been especially hard to compose. "Why?", you may ask. There is simply not much information to be found on the subject. It has taken weeks of internet research to uncover the smidgeon of information that has been acquired.

A relatively young company, Senomyx, may be responsible for the sodium and sugar levels falling in your favorite grocery store item. How are they doing this without affecting the taste? The truth is, they may be putting chemicals into your food right now without you even realizing it and without telling you.

And guess what? They don't have to.

Senomyx has contracted with Kraft, Nestle, Coca Cola, Campbell Soup to put a chemical in foods that masks bitter flavors by turning off bitter flavor receptors on the tongue and enhancing salty and sweet flavors. This would allow the companies to tout claims such as "less sugar" or "lower sodium" by reducing the actual sugar and/or salt by approximately half, but the foods will retain the same level of sweetness or saltiness when they touch the tongue by fooling your brain.

All of the companies, although admitting the exclusive contracting rights, decline to identify which foods and beverages the chemical additives have been or will be added to.

These chemical compounds are not required to be listed separately on food labels. On the contrary, they will be lobbed under the umbrella of "artificial flavors" which is already found on most food labels.

The foods that seem to be most in jeopardy of an insurrection of these new chemicals: soups, juices (fruit and vegetable), ice cream, and sauces.

"We are helping companies clean up their labels," said Kent Snyder, chief executive of Senomyx.

Mark Zoller, Senomyx's chief scientist, says that his company has used the human genome sequence and identified hundreds of taste receptors. Senomyx's chemical compounds enhance those receptors to heighten the taste of salt or sugar. Under this premise, they go on to claim that their newly added chemicals are completely safe because they will be used in tiny quantities of less than one part per million whereas artificial sweeteners are used in 200-500 parts per million. This fact alone allows them to forgo the rigorous FDA approval process when introducing new food additives into the marketplace. Attaining the status of GRAS (generally recognized as safe) from the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association for their most advanced product that replaces MSG, took this fledgling company less than an 18 month time frame by introducing a safety study of rats conducted for 3 months.

Executive Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Michael Jacobson, commended Senomyx's strides to reduce MSG, salt, and sugar but warned against introducing a new chemical additive into the food supply without strenuous testing. "A three-month study is completely inadequate," he said. "What you want is at least a two-year study on several species of animals."

After pouring a total of 30 million dollars into research and development, the companies that have invested into Senomyx's products have been secretive, to say the least, about their involvement within the company. Some, like Kraft, have declined to divulge any specifics regarding their relationship with Senomyx but instead stated that Kraft was committed "to reducing the sugar and salt levels in many products."

Nestle and Coca Cola declined to comment. I think silence says it all.
http://http://www.naturalnews.com/022982.html
fawn is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 04-28-2008, 04:12 PM   #2
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
Bejeweled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,403
Blog Entries: 1
Gallery: Bejeweled
Stats: 207+/152.6/140 5'7" - 16/6-8/?
WOE: Low Carb
Start Date: 12/8/07
That is scary
Bejeweled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:14 PM   #3
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
WendyK1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,076
Gallery: WendyK1974
That is sickening.
WendyK1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:39 PM   #4
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
ljh150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 1,363
Gallery: ljh150
Stats: 293 to 160 ~Pregnant w/ #4!~ 5'8" 30~
WOE: Atkins whole food
Start Date: January 15, 2003
Sadly, it doesn't even surprise me.
ljh150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:41 PM   #5
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
Houston Heather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,593
Gallery: Houston Heather
Stats: I lost it before and I'll lose it again!
WOE: Atkins 2002 + powerlifting and running
Read my signature. No processed foods except bacon and sausage.

UGH. I'm going to tell myself about this the next time I crave ice cream.
Houston Heather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 06:50 PM   #6
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
jdprecious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 3,831
Gallery: jdprecious
Stats: (220 preg high) 199 after baby/162 now/150 goal
WOE: Moderate Low Carb
Start Date: Over and over since Jan 2003
I am not surprised. I am just waiting for someone with big enough cajones to start suing their asses.
jdprecious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 07:06 PM   #7
Senior LCF Member
 
meb2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: kentucky
Posts: 564
Gallery: meb2004
Stats: 146/ don't want to know right now /130 5'9"
WOE: atkins / weston price / whole foods
Start Date: February 2004
AHHHHHHH!!! SERIOUSLY?? UGH! This kind of thing makes me so mad!!! I don't eat that much processed food due to ingredients they DO list! Now I have to watch out for unlisted ingredients? This is infuriating!!
meb2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 07:16 PM   #8
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
Mommie22boys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,002
Gallery: Mommie22boys
Stats: 208/160.8/128
WOE: Atkins '72. . .pass the eggs!
Start Date: 6/7/07 @ 193
I have already stopped buying anything that lists *artificial colors* in their ingredients. . .I guess I'll add *artificial flavors* to that list, too. Though I have become a much more diligent shopper lately. I read every single label now, and shop more and more in the Natural Foods section of my grocery store. Too many questionable "ingredients" out there these days.
Mommie22boys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 07:48 PM   #9
Senior LCF Member
 
KINDERHORE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SAN FRANCISCO
Posts: 354
Gallery: KINDERHORE
Stats: Was 317! 273/263.6/162
WOE: Whole foods/Low Carb
Start Date: 08/05
I did notice that. I bought a box of Corn Flakes for work and on the package it said that there are 24 grams of carbs, and only 2 of them were sugar, 1 was fiber, and 22 were "other". The top four ingredients in Corn Flakes in this order: MILLED CORN, SUGAR, MALT FLAVORING, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP.

They are liars.

Someone from the Bay Area did sue Nabisco for transfats in the Oreos and look how the industry has changed.

I wonder if food chemists eat their products. I'd like to make them.
KINDERHORE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 07:57 PM   #10
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
Livywilltim-mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 3,606
Gallery: Livywilltim-mom
Stats: 195/186/110
WOE: Atkins 72
Start Date: Restart:August 17, 2008
YIKES!

Again, thanks Fawn for your most helpful and incredible information!
Livywilltim-mom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 07:19 AM   #11
Senior LCF Member
 
ceceee8935's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 423
Blog Entries: 115
Gallery: ceceee8935
Stats: 219/162.5/150
WOE: atkins extended induction
Start Date: 1/8/08
And they wonder why all cancers are on the rise. They are no better than the tobacco companies
ceceee8935 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Copyright ©1999-2008 Friends Forums LLC. All rights reserved. - Terms of Service | Privacy Policy