Great article by the Eades

Tater Head · 05-10-2006, 10:25 AM

January 24, 2006
We never failed to fail...
A couple of days ago somewhere in our travels I happened to catch a few minutes of Rachael Ray’s show on the Food Network. On this particular episode Rachael was being her chirpy self, prattling on about one of her 30-minute meals when (I was only about half listening) I heard the words: low-carb. I tuned in a little more and realized that Rachael was making a low-carb 30-minute meal. As I watched, it slowly dawned on me that Rachael doesn’t have a clue as to what low-carb really means. She was making a dish that was pasta-based (not the low-carb variety) and was adding dried apricots and other fairly high-carb stuff here and there along the way. After watching the remainder of the show closely, I realized that Rachael’s idea of low-carb is to avoid bread and potatoes - everything else seemed to be okay. Then I figured that if Rachael doesn’t know any better and really believes she’s cooking low-carb, so must many other people.

If many other people are doing low-carb in the same way Rachael is, then they’re in for some bitter disappointment.

The whole idea brings to mind an article I wrote for the now-defunct Low Carb Living magazine a year or so ago. Here it is in its entirety. Copy it and give it to someone who believes he or she is truly on a low-carb diet.

We Never Failed to Fail
We never failed to fail; it was the easiest thing to do, so say Crosby, Stills and Nash in their terrific song Southern Cross. Unfortunately, multitudes of low-carb dieters today will be crying these same words if they’re not careful because low-carb diets, if followed in a half-hearted manner will fail, and the resultant regain of lost weight will be the easiest thing to do.
Recently the NPD Group, a marketing research company that provides information to industry, tracked the eating habits of 11,000 people who were cutting carbs as part of a strategy to lose weight. The results of this study found in the report Carbohydrate Consumption Patterns show that virtually none of the 11,000 subjects, and by extrapolation, few to none of the population at large represented by the study subjects, were cutting carbohydrate intake to a meaningful degree. Instead of the 20-50 grams of carbohydrate per day recommended by us in our book Protein Power or by Atkins, South Beach, Sugar Busters, etc. men were consuming an average of 145 carbs per day while women were eating around 109 grams per day. Although these carb-consumption figures are less than the 210 grams of carbohydrate eaten by the non-low-carb dieter, they are not nearly low enough to bring about the benefits of low-carb dieting. We fear that the people making a modest stab at lowering carbohydrate intake are in for major disappointment.
Low-carb diets bring about a host of positive changes. Along with ditching excess fat followers of sound low-carbohydrate regimens see their triglycerides fall, their blood pressures normalize, their lipid profiles improve, and their blood sugar levels stabilize. They sleep better, get rid of bad indigestion, even GERD if they have it, have more energy and are much, much less hungry. And, seemingly magically, low-carb dieters can even consume more calories than their brethren on low-fat diets and lose more weight. But, and here’s the big but"¦low carb diets must be followed correctly to bring about all these benefits. If not, there is no magic.
Most cells in the body can use glucose or fat or even protein, for that matter, for energy, but certain cells can use glucose only. Those glucose-only cells are some of the cells in the brain, the red blood cells, cells in the kidney and cells in the retina. All these glucose-using cells consume about 120-150 grams of glucose per day (about 3/4 of a cup), so if we’re eating 210 grams of carbohydrate per day as the Carbohydrate Consumption Report shows, then we have plenty of glucose (most carbohydrates convert to glucose in the body) to feed them with 60-90grams left over. As long as we’re getting the carbohydrate in our diet to meet the needs of these glucose-only cells, then nothing much happens metabolically. If we get these carbs and more and eat a lot of calories, we gain weight; if we get these carbs, but cut our calories, then we can lose a little. But we have no low-carb magic. It’s only when we get the carbs significantly down below the 120-150 grams we need that the metabolic changes that make low-carb diets work kick in. But, you may be wondering, what about all those cells that have to have glucose? What happens to then when we cut our carbs way back? Let’s take a look.
Over the time we’ve been on earth as humans nature has endowed us with some pretty amazing metabolic protective features. Many times in our evolutionary history, in fact, during most of it, we probably didn’t get much more than 50 or 60 grams of carbohydrate per day, if that many. Most of the cells in our bodies respond to this carbohydrate restriction by kicking the sugar habit (for at least as long as there is no sugar around) looking to fat for their energy. Other cells, particularly the brain cells, learn to love ketone bodies; in fact ketone bodies become a substitute for glucose for the brain. The heart also uses ketone bodies, and, in fact, uses them much more efficiently than it does either glucose or fat. This switch from glucose to ketone bodies and fat leaves the small amount of ingested carbohydrate for the cells that absolutely have to have it. But, a sound low-carbohydrate diet restricts the carbohydrate intake to the point that even with the switch over to fat and ketone bodies for fuel there still isn’t enough incoming carbohydrate to meet the needs of all the glucose-dependent cells.
Not to worry, the body can make glucose from protein and, to a small extent, even from fat in a process called gluconeogenesis (making new sugar) that takes place in the liver. In fact, when it gets going the liver can crank out 200+ grams per day (a little over a cup), which is more than enough for all the glucose-dependent cells even if we weren’t eating any carbs at all. This ability of the liver to make plenty of sugar is what allows the Inuit, the Masai, and other groups of hunter populations to survive nicely for most of their lives on almost no carbohydrates at all. And it is this same ability that makes low-carb diets work as well as they do.
When the carbs quit coming in, blood sugar starts to fall slightly, which throws the switch for the whole sugar conserving process to begin. Insulin levels fall and glucagon levels rise, sending the signal to the liver to start making both ketone bodies and glucose. As the ratio of insulin to glucagon falls the fat cells (the very ones we want to get rid of) start releasing fat to be used by all the tissues switching to a higher-fat, lower-glucose diet and to be used by the liver to convert to the glucose-pinch-hitting ketone bodies. It takes more energy to convert either fat or protein to glucose then to burn the glucose than it does to burn the fat or protein directly. It is this extra energy-consuming step that increases the number of calories a low-carbohydrate diet burns.
As long as the carbohydrate restriction is in place, insulin levels stay low so that all these glucose-preserving and glucose-making processes continue because these metabolic processes can’t take place when insulin is high. And since elevated insulin levels are a driving force behind high blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, lowered good cholesterol, glucose intolerance and all the rest of the problems associated with obesity, then lowering these elevated insulin levels undoes all these problems. But to get the insulin levels down and bring about all these benefits you’ve got to get your carb intake down to significantly below the 120-150 grams per day required by the glucose dependent cells. That’s why all the 11,000 people who think they are on low carb diets while consuming an average of 145 grams of carbohydrate per day will "never fail to fail" because it is indeed "the easiest thing to do" when you don’t keep your carbs low enough.
We and all the other authors of low-carbohydrate plans recommend that dieters reduce their carb consumption to the 20-50 grams per day level. We do that because we’ve all learned that the low-carb diet works at those levels, and now you know why. If you pussyfoot around with your carb restriction, you’ll go nowhere; if you commit, then you’ll bring all the wonderful metabolic pathways nature has endowed you with into play and you will experience the low-carb magic.

toomuchtolosetogain · 05-10-2006, 10:31 AM

Best article I have read in a long long time. Low carb seems like magic sometimes, but it is really science.

This one is a keeper for me.

Tater Head · 05-10-2006, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toomuchtolosetogain

Best article I have read in a long long time. Low carb seems like magic sometimes, but it is really science.

This one is a keeper for me.

I know, and I just love the Eades anyways. Their Blogs are great to read too.

pooticus · 05-10-2006, 10:54 AM

yeah awesome article. i do like them so much and think they make sense of very hard subjects!!

thediva · 05-10-2006, 11:26 AM

Thanks for sharing this Great Article! Really makes sense, eh?

Megansmom · 05-10-2006, 11:30 AM

I always worry that I'm not counting my carbs right but am losing weight quickly. I guess I must be doing something right. I love this diet and this group of people!
Tammy

whippetlady · 05-10-2006, 11:40 AM

The Eades can make it all sound so logical. They have a way to explain this really complex biochemistry so that anyone can understand it. And when you understand, you can DO it. If you don't realize that a "cheat" is not just a little indiscretion, but a sure fire way to throw your whole weight loss off by days/ weeks, then you certainly can fail. This is a perfect demonstration of why we need to read , learn and comprehend what we are doing with our WOE so we can be successful! Thanks for the great post.

Strawberry · 05-10-2006, 02:01 PM

Interesting, But I'm curious to know how those who follow BFL or BFFM feel about this article, because many are in that higher range of "low carb" with around 120 - 150g of carbs (or even more) a day.

Magicsmom · 05-10-2006, 08:37 PM

I love the Eades. The first time I read their original Protein Power book in 1999, I knew right away that I was insulin resistant. The concept is so simple - that you have to eat in such a way as to avoid an insulin release. It really is basic chemistry.

tiggy_oz · 05-11-2006, 02:13 AM

They are excellent at explaining biochem - thanks for the post.

On the BLF note - i think that bfl does not tout itself as a LC WOE really. The carbs are there for a reason (high exercise need). The type of carbs used are for a reason as well - whole grains and low GI keep you feeling fuller longer, as well as having a number of health benifits compared to fluffy white bread. BFL meals are pretty typical for many health conscious types trying to get fit and build muscle.

As a BFL'er i totally agree with the article as it is written as its pure science - basic nutritional biochem. I lose weight faster on true LC, but i do find that bfl meals provide me with more easily available energy when exercising vigously.

KajunDC · 05-11-2006, 10:40 AM

I've seen a few of Rachel's low carb shows and I don't remember one that was pasta based or would not qualify as low carb. Maybe I mised one.

Tater Head · 05-11-2006, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KajunDC

I've seen a few of Rachel's low carb shows and I don't remember one that was pasta based or would not qualify as low carb. Maybe I mised one.

Oh yah, you missed some shows kajun, lol. She has used dried fruit,honey,and yes even pasta, you name it and she'll say things like "It's just a little bit so it's not to bad" yada yada.

05-10-2006, 10:25 AM	#1
Tater Head Very Gabby LCF Member!!! Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Cave Creek Az. Posts: 3,713 Gallery: Tater Head Stats: 210/186/135 WOE: Protein Power Start Date: January 5th 2005	Great article by the Eades January 24, 2006 We never failed to fail... A couple of days ago somewhere in our travels I happened to catch a few minutes of Rachael Ray’s show on the Food Network. On this particular episode Rachael was being her chirpy self, prattling on about one of her 30-minute meals when (I was only about half listening) I heard the words: low-carb. I tuned in a little more and realized that Rachael was making a low-carb 30-minute meal. As I watched, it slowly dawned on me that Rachael doesn’t have a clue as to what low-carb really means. She was making a dish that was pasta-based (not the low-carb variety) and was adding dried apricots and other fairly high-carb stuff here and there along the way. After watching the remainder of the show closely, I realized that Rachael’s idea of low-carb is to avoid bread and potatoes - everything else seemed to be okay. Then I figured that if Rachael doesn’t know any better and really believes she’s cooking low-carb, so must many other people. If many other people are doing low-carb in the same way Rachael is, then they’re in for some bitter disappointment. The whole idea brings to mind an article I wrote for the now-defunct Low Carb Living magazine a year or so ago. Here it is in its entirety. Copy it and give it to someone who believes he or she is truly on a low-carb diet. We Never Failed to Fail We never failed to fail; it was the easiest thing to do, so say Crosby, Stills and Nash in their terrific song Southern Cross. Unfortunately, multitudes of low-carb dieters today will be crying these same words if they’re not careful because low-carb diets, if followed in a half-hearted manner will fail, and the resultant regain of lost weight will be the easiest thing to do. Recently the NPD Group, a marketing research company that provides information to industry, tracked the eating habits of 11,000 people who were cutting carbs as part of a strategy to lose weight. The results of this study found in the report Carbohydrate Consumption Patterns show that virtually none of the 11,000 subjects, and by extrapolation, few to none of the population at large represented by the study subjects, were cutting carbohydrate intake to a meaningful degree. Instead of the 20-50 grams of carbohydrate per day recommended by us in our book Protein Power or by Atkins, South Beach, Sugar Busters, etc. men were consuming an average of 145 carbs per day while women were eating around 109 grams per day. Although these carb-consumption figures are less than the 210 grams of carbohydrate eaten by the non-low-carb dieter, they are not nearly low enough to bring about the benefits of low-carb dieting. We fear that the people making a modest stab at lowering carbohydrate intake are in for major disappointment. Low-carb diets bring about a host of positive changes. Along with ditching excess fat followers of sound low-carbohydrate regimens see their triglycerides fall, their blood pressures normalize, their lipid profiles improve, and their blood sugar levels stabilize. They sleep better, get rid of bad indigestion, even GERD if they have it, have more energy and are much, much less hungry. And, seemingly magically, low-carb dieters can even consume more calories than their brethren on low-fat diets and lose more weight. But, and here’s the big but"¦low carb diets must be followed correctly to bring about all these benefits. If not, there is no magic. Most cells in the body can use glucose or fat or even protein, for that matter, for energy, but certain cells can use glucose only. Those glucose-only cells are some of the cells in the brain, the red blood cells, cells in the kidney and cells in the retina. All these glucose-using cells consume about 120-150 grams of glucose per day (about 3/4 of a cup), so if we’re eating 210 grams of carbohydrate per day as the Carbohydrate Consumption Report shows, then we have plenty of glucose (most carbohydrates convert to glucose in the body) to feed them with 60-90grams left over. As long as we’re getting the carbohydrate in our diet to meet the needs of these glucose-only cells, then nothing much happens metabolically. If we get these carbs and more and eat a lot of calories, we gain weight; if we get these carbs, but cut our calories, then we can lose a little. But we have no low-carb magic. It’s only when we get the carbs significantly down below the 120-150 grams we need that the metabolic changes that make low-carb diets work kick in. But, you may be wondering, what about all those cells that have to have glucose? What happens to then when we cut our carbs way back? Let’s take a look. Over the time we’ve been on earth as humans nature has endowed us with some pretty amazing metabolic protective features. Many times in our evolutionary history, in fact, during most of it, we probably didn’t get much more than 50 or 60 grams of carbohydrate per day, if that many. Most of the cells in our bodies respond to this carbohydrate restriction by kicking the sugar habit (for at least as long as there is no sugar around) looking to fat for their energy. Other cells, particularly the brain cells, learn to love ketone bodies; in fact ketone bodies become a substitute for glucose for the brain. The heart also uses ketone bodies, and, in fact, uses them much more efficiently than it does either glucose or fat. This switch from glucose to ketone bodies and fat leaves the small amount of ingested carbohydrate for the cells that absolutely have to have it. But, a sound low-carbohydrate diet restricts the carbohydrate intake to the point that even with the switch over to fat and ketone bodies for fuel there still isn’t enough incoming carbohydrate to meet the needs of all the glucose-dependent cells. Not to worry, the body can make glucose from protein and, to a small extent, even from fat in a process called gluconeogenesis (making new sugar) that takes place in the liver. In fact, when it gets going the liver can crank out 200+ grams per day (a little over a cup), which is more than enough for all the glucose-dependent cells even if we weren’t eating any carbs at all. This ability of the liver to make plenty of sugar is what allows the Inuit, the Masai, and other groups of hunter populations to survive nicely for most of their lives on almost no carbohydrates at all. And it is this same ability that makes low-carb diets work as well as they do. When the carbs quit coming in, blood sugar starts to fall slightly, which throws the switch for the whole sugar conserving process to begin. Insulin levels fall and glucagon levels rise, sending the signal to the liver to start making both ketone bodies and glucose. As the ratio of insulin to glucagon falls the fat cells (the very ones we want to get rid of) start releasing fat to be used by all the tissues switching to a higher-fat, lower-glucose diet and to be used by the liver to convert to the glucose-pinch-hitting ketone bodies. It takes more energy to convert either fat or protein to glucose then to burn the glucose than it does to burn the fat or protein directly. It is this extra energy-consuming step that increases the number of calories a low-carbohydrate diet burns. As long as the carbohydrate restriction is in place, insulin levels stay low so that all these glucose-preserving and glucose-making processes continue because these metabolic processes can’t take place when insulin is high. And since elevated insulin levels are a driving force behind high blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, lowered good cholesterol, glucose intolerance and all the rest of the problems associated with obesity, then lowering these elevated insulin levels undoes all these problems. But to get the insulin levels down and bring about all these benefits you’ve got to get your carb intake down to significantly below the 120-150 grams per day required by the glucose dependent cells. That’s why all the 11,000 people who think they are on low carb diets while consuming an average of 145 grams of carbohydrate per day will "never fail to fail" because it is indeed "the easiest thing to do" when you don’t keep your carbs low enough. We and all the other authors of low-carbohydrate plans recommend that dieters reduce their carb consumption to the 20-50 grams per day level. We do that because we’ve all learned that the low-carb diet works at those levels, and now you know why. If you pussyfoot around with your carb restriction, you’ll go nowhere; if you commit, then you’ll bring all the wonderful metabolic pathways nature has endowed you with into play and you will experience the low-carb magic.

05-11-2006, 02:13 AM	#10
tiggy_oz MAJOR LCF POSTER! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Australia, QLD Posts: 1,120 Gallery: tiggy_oz Stats: back/yet/again	They are excellent at explaining biochem - thanks for the post. On the BLF note - i think that bfl does not tout itself as a LC WOE really. The carbs are there for a reason (high exercise need). The type of carbs used are for a reason as well - whole grains and low GI keep you feeling fuller longer, as well as having a number of health benifits compared to fluffy white bread. BFL meals are pretty typical for many health conscious types trying to get fit and build muscle. As a BFL'er i totally agree with the article as it is written as its pure science - basic nutritional biochem. I lose weight faster on true LC, but i do find that bfl meals provide me with more easily available energy when exercising vigously. __________________ "We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world." -Buddha

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-10-2006, 10:31 AM	#2
toomuchtolosetogain MAJOR LCF POSTER! Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mid Missouri Posts: 1,839 Gallery: toomuchtolosetogain Stats: 229/161/129 18-20/6 & 8/6?4? 52 years old WOE: Low Carb/Atkins Start Date: Oct. 2003 (serious this time)	Best article I have read in a long long time. Low carb seems like magic sometimes, but it is really science. This one is a keeper for me.

05-10-2006, 10:54 AM	#4
pooticus Way too much time on my hands! Join Date: May 2004 Location: somewhere over the rainbow Posts: 15,889 Gallery: pooticus Stats: 314/268.4/150 WOE: PersonalPlan Start Date: Nov.20, 2007	yeah awesome article. i do like them so much and think they make sense of very hard subjects!!

05-10-2006, 11:26 AM	#5
thediva Senior LCF Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: CA Paradise Posts: 511 Gallery: thediva Stats: 165/141/127, size14/8/4,6 WOE: Lowcarb Start Date: Feb 2006	Thanks for sharing this Great Article! Really makes sense, eh?

05-10-2006, 11:30 AM	#6
Megansmom Junior LCF Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Michigan Posts: 18 Gallery: Megansmom Stats: 159/136/120/108 WOE: Atkins Start Date: Feb 06	I always worry that I'm not counting my carbs right but am losing weight quickly. I guess I must be doing something right. I love this diet and this group of people! Tammy

05-10-2006, 11:40 AM	#7
whippetlady Blabbermouth!!! Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: OH Posts: 6,522 Gallery: whippetlady Stats: 157/133/130 5'5 small frame WOE: Protein and Bourbon Start Date: Feb. 22, 2006	The Eades can make it all sound so logical. They have a way to explain this really complex biochemistry so that anyone can understand it. And when you understand, you can DO it. If you don't realize that a "cheat" is not just a little indiscretion, but a sure fire way to throw your whole weight loss off by days/ weeks, then you certainly can fail. This is a perfect demonstration of why we need to read , learn and comprehend what we are doing with our WOE so we can be successful! Thanks for the great post.

05-10-2006, 02:01 PM	#8
Strawberry MAJOR LCF POSTER! Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,720 Gallery: Strawberry	Interesting, But I'm curious to know how those who follow BFL or BFFM feel about this article, because many are in that higher range of "low carb" with around 120 - 150g of carbs (or even more) a day.

05-10-2006, 08:37 PM	#9
Magicsmom Committed to Succeed Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: State of Mind Posts: 16,021 Gallery: Magicsmom WOE: Seeing a nutritionist who believes in low carb! Start Date: Off & On (mostly on) since January 2004	I love the Eades. The first time I read their original Protein Power book in 1999, I knew right away that I was insulin resistant. The concept is so simple - that you have to eat in such a way as to avoid an insulin release. It really is basic chemistry.

05-11-2006, 10:40 AM	#11
KajunDC Natural Healthcare Chiropractor Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA (Just North of New Orleans) Posts: 2,411 Gallery: KajunDC Stats: Lost 115lbs in 7 months Body Fat-40+%/11%/9% WOE: Organic, Fresh and Non-Processed Start Date: Low Carb-Mar04, BFFM-Jul05	I've seen a few of Rachel's low carb shows and I don't remember one that was pasta based or would not qualify as low carb. Maybe I mised one.