|03-14-2014, 04:05 AM||#62|
Join Date: Mar 2000
WOE: N.K.=vlc/hf/moderate protein & organic/pastured
Start Date: Restart Oct 18 2009
For some people it is a moving target so to speak and this adds an element of challenge. But if a person knows that a certain amount of macro has an effect that is undesireable- that is ideal.
As for a 'critical fat level' is concerned, it is the one of the macro nutrients that can be adjusted in order to achieve fat loss according the Phinney and Volek. If carbs and protein are at the proper amounts and weight loss is not happening, then fat needs to be adjusted down.
The problem is that even with that adjustment, it still doesn't work for some. It then becomes about calorie counting. I rail against this method but am always aware of the # and tend towards the low end (1100) and if lowering fat further is the key, I can't do it.
I think that a lot of people who have not had the extreme difficulty with weight loss appear to think certain things that seem obvious and think those that are challenged just don't get it. This is not the case. Those that have been on the end of difficult weight loss have thought of it all and have done a lot of research and different approaches such as lowering fat and all the other fiddling with macros. It just doesn't work and to have someone tell someone else (or to imply it) is just plain maddening. It is obvious. Please give some credit and also understand that no one wants to be in an endless weight loss stall. Those that hang around here for year after year are often those that are still trying to find the solution and it is not as simple as some people imply.
In the meantime, losing very slowly or maintaining losses is a win and learning about the physiology is a win. I only wish that those that have not had this struggle would give the credit due to those in this situation.
Original start - Feb. 2000 180/125
"The energy content of food (calories) matters, but it is less important than the metabolic effect of food on our body." Dr. P. Attia
"dumping carbohydrates on your broken metabolism is tantamount to doing jumping jacks on two broken legs" -The Spark of Reason
“Eat animals. Mostly fat. Enjoy!
|03-14-2014, 06:04 AM||#63|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Stats: 274 /219/190
Start Date: LC-1999,jan2010 274 NK 1-1-13 at 244
I, too, am "happy" with the maintaining thing, I think.
As we search and reach out for some hope and information, it gets discouraging to hear the same things each time we put our struggles out there for the world to dissect.
As determined as we are, it is maddening to be stalled for YEARS!
|03-14-2014, 11:43 AM||#64|
Major LCF Poster!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Gallery: Auntie Em
Start Date: Maintenance since 2000
Cathy, thanks for your kind words.
The puzzle to find what works and what doesn't, is an ever-changing puzzle for me. Getting older, allergies, new stresses, and surprise reactions to foods. I can only do the 1100-ish kCals for a short time, and live more often at that uneasy compromise which Jem51 wrote about, eating more for happy brain function, but not being as sleek as my vanity would prefer. I do the strict, eat-less version of my food plan in the summer, and find it works well with sunshine, being outdoors, and the "happifying" effects of sunny living. But the colder months are more challenging.
I find that I have to keep making cleaner food choices, only have indulgences which are in the primary food list, be line-in-the-sand diligent about exercise, rest, meditation/prayer, sunshine, food plan, and avoiding stress factors which I have found disrupt my metabolism. If one of those factors "falls through the cracks", it can take a good while for me to get back on an even keel.
I look forward to the next posts in this thread.
Maintainers Over 55
Best wishes for happy, healthy LCing.
Last edited by Auntie Em; 03-14-2014 at 11:56 AM.. Reason: corrections