Low Carb Friends  
Netrition.com - Tools - Reviews - Faces - Recipes - Home


Go Back   Low Carb Friends > Eating and Exercise Plans > Weight Loss Plans > Nutritional Ketosis / High Fat, Low Carb
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2013, 12:47 PM   #1
Junior LCF Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
Gallery: Lovamelin
Keto and Garcinia Cambogia?

I was taking Garcinia Max, which contains a high concentration of garcinia cambogia. Supposedly one of the things it helps is to prevent fat absorption. So far from the 2-3 weeks I've been taking it I notice more general energy increases as opposed to anything else. But I just wanted to double check that I'm not hurting my keto diet if I keep taking this stuff. I mostly just don't want to waste the money I spent on it Below is a link that talks about what garcinia cambogia is supposed to do. How backed up all of the claims are I don't know. According to this it looks like it could help some as far as efficiently processing fats for energy, I just want to make sure I'm not blocking the necessary absorbtion as well.
Lovamelin is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 02-13-2013, 01:34 PM   #2
Blabbermouth!!!
 
reddarin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,452
Gallery: reddarin
Stats: 6' 47y/o 265/193/170
WOE: NK
Start Date: Aug 13, 2011
If I read it right, the biggest benefit is purportedly gives is blocking carb conversion to glucose. An NK person wouldn't benefit from that.

This bullet point:

"Promotes normal cholesterol levels*"

... I'd be concerned about. There is a lot of hysteria about cholesterol but mostly it is misinformation. Statins, for example, are a huge growth industry based on outright lies and misinformation about cholesterol. I'm very concerned about any product that might lower it.

And LC/NK deals with cholesterol better than any drug except in very few specific cases.

This...

"and promotes an increase in the formation of stored energy as glycogen"

...is meaningless. How does it promote that? I imagine this is an inferred benefit from some other supposed benefit.

They mention the study they are basing their claims on but they do not give the name of the study or provide a link. If it proves what they are claiming why not link to it? Seems strange.

I also noticed that when they describe specific results from the study they seem to be using the awful type of relative statistics that have been used to peddle a lot of pharmacological drugs of questionable benefit.

Email them and ask for a link to the study.

Personally, I wouldn't buy any more. The pills don't seem to be promising anything that you won't get with LC or NK as a matter of course.
reddarin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 02:59 PM   #3
Senior LCF Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 867
Gallery: shelley
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddarin View Post
If I read it right, the biggest benefit is purportedly gives is blocking carb conversion to glucose. An NK person wouldn't benefit from that.

This bullet point:

"Promotes normal cholesterol levels*"

... I'd be concerned about. There is a lot of hysteria about cholesterol but mostly it is misinformation. Statins, for example, are a huge growth industry based on outright lies and misinformation about cholesterol. I'm very concerned about any product that might lower it.

And LC/NK deals with cholesterol better than any drug except in very few specific cases.

This...

"and promotes an increase in the formation of stored energy as glycogen"

...is meaningless. How does it promote that? I imagine this is an inferred benefit from some other supposed benefit.

They mention the study they are basing their claims on but they do not give the name of the study or provide a link. If it proves what they are claiming why not link to it? Seems strange.

I also noticed that when they describe specific results from the study they seem to be using the awful type of relative statistics that have been used to peddle a lot of pharmacological drugs of questionable benefit.

Email them and ask for a link to the study.

Personally, I wouldn't buy any more. The pills don't seem to be promising anything that you won't get with LC or NK as a matter of course.
Well done Major Red!!!!!
shelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Copyright ©1999-2014 Friends Forums LLC. All rights reserved. - Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
LowCarbFriends® is a registered mark of Friends Forums, LLC.