Low Carb Friends  
Netrition.com - Tools - Reviews - Faces - Recipes - Home


Go Back   Low Carb Friends > Main Lowcarb Lobby
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2008, 12:25 PM   #1
Junior LCF Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
Gallery: jenny_bean
Russell Stover's Net Carbs & Sugar Free

Hi everyone,

I was looking at Russell Stover's website (thanks to LESSOFME's post about Easter candy!) and noticed they have 2 different lines of candy: Net Carbs and Sugar Free. I can't find ingredient lists on their website, so I'm wondering: what's the difference? The description for the Net Carbs products say "no sugar carbs." So do the Net Carbs products not use sugar alcohols?

Thanks!
jenny_bean is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 03-02-2008, 12:37 PM   #2
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
jacksmixedtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: going to school in NC
Posts: 3,511
Gallery: jacksmixedtape
Stats: 160/140ish, 5'11"
WOE: gluten-free whole foods
Start Date: May 2007
They all use maltitol, which isn't even low carb. I see less of the "net carb" products now, and more "sugar-free." It's a marketing gimmick.
jacksmixedtape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 12:40 PM   #3
Way too much time on my hands!
 
lisabinil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 17,974
Gallery: lisabinil
Stats: 287/Restart 206/177/160 5'6"
WOE: Healthy Carb for Optimum Health
Start Date: 2/4/10
Yup most all sugar alcohol have calories and carbs. Many people don't have trouble with erythritol or xylitol though. Google sugar alcohols for a wealth of info. If it seems to good to be real it usually is. About.com has some good articles about this too.
lisabinil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 12:46 PM   #4
Senior LCF Member
 
sappl38220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Northern MN~GODS Country
Posts: 548
Gallery: sappl38220
Stats: 198/190/140
WOE: general lo carb
Start Date: on & off since Dec '99
I'm not sure of the difference other than what jacksmixedtape said, a marketing gimmick. If you really feel you need some of them to get through Easter, then go Walgreens and browse. They have a ton of sugar free candy. Just remember that your tummy will not be happy if you eat more than 1 or 2.
sappl38220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 01:44 PM   #5
Senior LCF Member
 
MountainRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 71
Gallery: MountainRose
Stats: 230/185/140
Start Date: June 2007
Just seeing the name brings on back memories of intense pain, and I haven't eaten them in years! Give me chocolate bark anytime.
MountainRose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 05:48 PM   #6
Senior LCF Member
 
3shewolf8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: S.W. Michigan
Posts: 96
Gallery: 3shewolf8
Stats: 262/261/190
WOE: Atkins
Start Date: 2014
I had to buy/eat some of the sugar fee peeps. I used to love regular peeps, those nothing but sugar marshmallow CRAP. I have to admit, I ate two packs and they are made with splenda. They didn't bother me at all. zero net carbs. I will probably be stalled for awhile, but MAN were they great. I do not regret it at all.
3shewolf8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 05:51 PM   #7
Big Yapper!!!!
 
lil miss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,941
Gallery: lil miss
WOE: LCMW
Start Date: 1/1/13
JUST bought some Russel Stover chocolate caramels, "ooo what a treat..." I thought to myself, ate ONE, yes ONE and two hours later, rumblings in the belly and I was in the bathroom....

Vow to never eat 'em again.
lil miss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 06:14 PM   #8
something there
 
cleochatra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 14,736
Gallery: cleochatra
Stats: 364/233/125 5'5" [44]
WOE: Atkins '72
Start Date: August 31, 2012
Sugar alcohols will make you Queen for a Day!

That's because you'll be stuck on the 'throne', IYKWIM.
cleochatra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 08:24 PM   #9
Blabbermouth!!!
 
FloridaShell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,260
Gallery: FloridaShell
Stats: Grrr/Grrr/130
WOE: My own way of l/cing
Start Date: 1/2/08
They taste good, but don't make ya feel good.
FloridaShell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 06:22 AM   #10
Blabbermouth!!!
 
DEBI IN OHIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,989
Gallery: DEBI IN OHIO
Stats: 235.5/-----/150ish?
WOE: Diabetic.lower carbs
Start Date: 05/01, restart 2/22/08 again
I would overeat Peeps or marshmallow eggs....I know better than to overeat any Russel stovers )
but it sure does clean out ur colon!!!
DEBI IN OHIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 07:48 AM   #11
Major LCF Poster!
 
DolphinsOnMyMind777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,938
Stats: 224/198.6/150
WOE: Atkins & Exercise
Start Date: Start Date: October 17,2011
EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
Do they make everyone sick and if so why do they sell them then?
DolphinsOnMyMind777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 07:48 AM   #12
Major LCF Poster!
 
DolphinsOnMyMind777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,938
Stats: 224/198.6/150
WOE: Atkins & Exercise
Start Date: Start Date: October 17,2011
Did someone say peeps? How many carbs in 'em? Where do you get 'em?
DolphinsOnMyMind777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 10:23 AM   #13
Senior LCF Member
 
my3sonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 114
Gallery: my3sonz
Stats: 173/154.5/120
Start Date: Restart - 5/2012; JUDDD 12/12/12
There is no difference in the Russell Stovers candies... one is in a red bag, the other is green.

There was a thread about his YEARS ago and someone emailed Russell Stover. The question to the company was "why did the net carb product cost more than the SF." If you compare the ingredients, they are (or were) the EXACT same for net carb vs SF. The company's response was basically that THEY knew there was a difference in the way the candies were made but either couldn't or wouldn't explain.

So, unless something has changed since then, the difference was that the net carb cost more than the SF. I can't eat them unless, like Cleo said, I want to be queen for the weekend!
__________________
Tracy
my3sonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 11:05 AM   #14
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
Mule_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,297
Gallery: Mule_Freak
Stats: 145/125-130/135
WOE: moderate carbs
Start Date: Oct. 2003
I got the Sugar Free Peeps at Krogers, 3 in a pk. for a buck. I LOVE Peeps, and thank the Good Lord Sugar Alchols don't "rub me the wrong way" but some folks it will tear them up.
Mule_Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 12:06 PM   #15
Way too much time on my hands!
 
lisabinil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 17,974
Gallery: lisabinil
Stats: 287/Restart 206/177/160 5'6"
WOE: Healthy Carb for Optimum Health
Start Date: 2/4/10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mule_Freak View Post
I got the Sugar Free Peeps at Krogers, 3 in a pk. for a buck. I LOVE Peeps, and thank the Good Lord Sugar Alchols don't "rub me the wrong way" but some folks it will tear them up.
This means your body is digesting the maltitol and isomalt and the carb count is higher than what the packaging states-your body is processing the SA's.
lisabinil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 01:03 PM   #16
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
ItsNot2L8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 4,207
Gallery: ItsNot2L8
WOE: Grains aren't food, grains are what food eats
Quote:
Originally Posted by DolphinsOnMyMind777 View Post
EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
Do they make everyone sick and if so why do they sell them then?
They don't make everyone sick, as LisaB says if you're not getting sick it means your body is processing it and the "net impact" on your body is probably higher than what it says on the package. Seems to be a wide range of sensitivity, lil miss wasn't feeling too good after one serving, I can have two but three is way too much for my system, other people it doesn't bother at all.

And they don't make most people sick if you stick to one serving. Problem is some of those servings seem pretty small - if there are 6 bits of candy in a bag, not all of us will eat only two of them just because that's what the label says a serving is

A great alternative for an occasional treat is chocolate with a high cocoa content. I'm looking at an Endangered Species Supreme Dark Chocolate bar, it has 15 squares that are about the same size as (or maybe a tad smaller than) a Russell Stover toffee square. The whole bar (72% cocoa) has 14g total, 9 net, so each square has less than one gram of carbohydrates. And one or two squares is usually enough.
__________________
~Too much sugar makes too much Shelly~
ItsNot2L8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 01:16 PM   #17
Senior LCF Member
 
haileygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 184
Gallery: haileygirl
Stats: 137/137/125
WOE: >30 grams carbs daily
The packags says a serving of sugar free peeps has 23 carbs?
haileygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 03:21 PM   #18
Major LCF Poster!
 
catne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Smack dab in the Middle
Posts: 1,826
Gallery: catne
Stats: XXX/X/???
WOE: Low Carb, Cycling Atkins/Stillmans
Start Date: restart 3/06/2012
wow--they don't "lose" a lot of carbs when they take out the sugar, do they? That's a 1 ounce package w/23 g. carbs...
catne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 06:37 AM   #19
Junior LCF Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31
Gallery: Carm
I eat these all the time...they really help with the sweet tooth cravings. they don't make me sick at all, but i do get major rumblings in my tummy...and only some sugar free candy will make my tummy make all those noises...chocolate DOESN'T (thank GOD!!) but twizzlers do...if i have 2 twizzlers, my tummy is going nuts within 20 minutes, guaranteed...but it never actually makes me sick or have to run to the bathroom, so i eat it anyways...
Carm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 04:08 PM   #20
Major LCF Poster!
 
Blood Sugar 101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 2,839
Gallery: Blood Sugar 101
Stats: 1998-2009 170/142/145---2010 138/142/138
WOE: 80-100g per day. Metformin (no more prandin!)
Start Date: First LC diet 1998, goal 2003, continual vigilance
Years ago I got out my trusty blood sugar meter and tested 3 Low Carb Russell Stover candies and 3 regular ones.

What I learned was that the "low carb" version raised my blood sugar almost as high as the regular, but it took another hour or so for the carbs to show up in my bloodstream. Testing at 3 hours would be necessary which could fool a lot of people.

I also learned that the taste of the low carb versions was so inferior to that of the real ones, that it was better to eat a real one and take the carb hit up front rather than delude myself that the nasty tasting low carb one was better for me.
Blood Sugar 101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 04:16 PM   #21
Blabbermouth!!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Edge of Insanity
Posts: 5,156
Gallery: LCinHouston
Start Date: 12/12/07
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3shewolf8 View Post
I had to buy/eat some of the sugar fee peeps. I used to love regular peeps, those nothing but sugar marshmallow CRAP. I have to admit, I ate two packs and they are made with splenda. They didn't bother me at all. zero net carbs. I will probably be stalled for awhile, but MAN were they great. I do not regret it at all.
Ingredients: Maltitol, Isomalt, Polyglycitol Syrup, Sorbitol, Gelatin, Calcium Chloride, Natural Flavors, Yellow #5 Lake, Sucralose, Potassium Sorbate (A Preservative), Carnauba Wax.

the first and main ingrediant in SF Peeps is maltitol...the first FOUR ingredients are sugar alcohols!!! they used just enough splenda in their mix (see it way down towards the end of the list?!) to be able to put it on the packaging.

for anyone sugar alcohol-wary...be warned!

Last edited by LCinHouston; 03-05-2008 at 04:18 PM..
LCinHouston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 04:20 PM   #22
KOO
Way too much time on my hands!
 
KOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 21,720
Gallery: KOO
Stats: Starting 183(2/06)now below....
WOE: Hcg 9/12/12...142.5/134/130
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3shewolf8 View Post
I had to buy/eat some of the sugar fee peeps. I used to love regular peeps, those nothing but sugar marshmallow CRAP. I have to admit, I ate two packs and they are made with splenda. They didn't bother me at all. zero net carbs. I will probably be stalled for awhile, but MAN were they great. I do not regret it at all.
I haven't seen those. Glad to know they make they so I can get them for dd,13.
KOO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 12:58 PM   #23
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
ItsNot2L8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 4,207
Gallery: ItsNot2L8
WOE: Grains aren't food, grains are what food eats
Quote:
Originally Posted by LCinHouston View Post
Ingredients: Maltitol, Isomalt, Polyglycitol Syrup, Sorbitol, Gelatin, Calcium Chloride, Natural Flavors, Yellow #5 Lake, Sucralose, Potassium Sorbate (A Preservative), Carnauba Wax.

the first and main ingrediant in SF Peeps is maltitol...the first FOUR ingredients are sugar alcohols!!! they used just enough splenda in their mix (see it way down towards the end of the list?!) to be able to put it on the packaging.

for anyone sugar alcohol-wary...be warned!
I saw these for the first time last year, noticed the same thing, wondered how many parents were going to buy these for their kids at Easter, and how many of them wouldn't read the label and would think they're sweetened with just Splenda, and how many of those kids would sneak into their baskets when the grownups weren't looking and chow down on all those sf peeps, and how long it would take those parents to figure out what caused the sudden onset of tummyaches and diarrhea in their little tikes.
ItsNot2L8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 01:15 PM   #24
Major LCF Poster!
 
dointhis4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,763
Gallery: dointhis4me
Stats: 258.8/249.4/165
WOE: Low carb my way
Start Date: 3/17/14
I was so tempted today at Kroger to buy the SF Peeps! I LOVED Peeps! But I stopped myself after looking at the package...they were 23 carbs and 23 Sugar Alcohol so I knew they would tear my tummy up!
I've found this saying to be right on the money as far as sugar free candies & chocolate go... if it sounds too good to be true....it probably is!
dointhis4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 02:17 PM   #25
Way too much time on my hands!
 
lisabinil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 17,974
Gallery: lisabinil
Stats: 287/Restart 206/177/160 5'6"
WOE: Healthy Carb for Optimum Health
Start Date: 2/4/10
The peeps taste awful!
lisabinil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 02:26 PM   #26
Major LCF Poster!
 
LaRae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: OKlahoma
Posts: 2,963
Gallery: LaRae
Stats: 275/257/I'll know
WOE: Low Carb
Start Date: Restart 9/8/14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood Sugar 101 View Post
Years ago I got out my trusty blood sugar meter and tested 3 Low Carb Russell Stover candies and 3 regular ones.

What I learned was that the "low carb" version raised my blood sugar almost as high as the regular, but it took another hour or so for the carbs to show up in my bloodstream. Testing at 3 hours would be necessary which could fool a lot of people.

I also learned that the taste of the low carb versions was so inferior to that of the real ones, that it was better to eat a real one and take the carb hit up front rather than delude myself that the nasty tasting low carb one was better for me.
Is your blood sugar meter something that diabetics use? It's great that you can test certain foods to see if they will spike your blood sugar. I would like one of those!
LaRae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 09:27 PM   #27
KOO
Way too much time on my hands!
 
KOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 21,720
Gallery: KOO
Stats: Starting 183(2/06)now below....
WOE: Hcg 9/12/12...142.5/134/130
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisabinil View Post
The peeps taste awful!

DD,13, tried them today, she found them sweeter than a normal peep.
KOO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 09:55 PM   #28
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
 
jacksmixedtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: going to school in NC
Posts: 3,511
Gallery: jacksmixedtape
Stats: 160/140ish, 5'11"
WOE: gluten-free whole foods
Start Date: May 2007
Omg, I tried the peeps and loved 'em! Had them after a meal, so no after-effects. They were worth all the chemicals and SAs. Used to love those things!
jacksmixedtape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 07:22 PM   #29
Senior LCF Member
 
Aijarama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Asbury Park, NJ
Posts: 917
Gallery: Aijarama
Stats: 280/245/175
WOE: Paleo/LC
Start Date: 11/06 @280, 5/10 @242 8/14 @ 245
***BUMP***

Just bought Russelll Stover's SF "Reserve Collection" - classy, I know - in the dark chocolate, 60% cacao, and it is deLIsh! I think they count a serving as 3 squares (good-sized squares, too), but just one is just right before bed - has anyone tried?
Aijarama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:17 PM   #30
Major LCF Poster!
 
lowcarbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,145
Gallery: lowcarbie
Stats: 220/194/??????
WOE: Atkins
Start Date: restart again: 3/1/2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenny_bean View Post
Hi everyone,

I was looking at Russell Stover's website (thanks to LESSOFME's post about Easter candy!) and noticed they have 2 different lines of candy: Net Carbs and Sugar Free. I can't find ingredient lists on their website, so I'm wondering: what's the difference? The description for the Net Carbs products say "no sugar carbs." So do the Net Carbs products not use sugar alcohols?

Thanks!
I like the green bag Russell Stover's mint patties, the caramel patties, the coconut patties but I can't eat more than one bag a day LOL!!!! (6 pieces) because they WILL make you go to the bathroom quick!!!
lowcarbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Copyright ©1999-2014 Friends Forums LLC. All rights reserved. - Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
LowCarbFriends® is a registered mark of Friends Forums, LLC.