![]() |
|
|
|
#2132 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2133 |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2134 |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2135 | ||
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for all the links. I do go check them out even if I don't comment! Night! ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#2136 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Quote:
I guess we always want what we don't have.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2137 |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
But some of us don't take it quite as far as others...
At least, I don't think any of us have gone so far as to "borrow" our after pictures from the Russian Brides websites... ![]() ok, I'll be Kate, if you want to be Farrah... I always did want to have pretty brown hair... the dumb blonde stuff gets pretty old... but I don't want to have to wear a wig... please. |
|
|
|
|
#2138 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Quote:
I'd say SNAP! -- But I think SNATT is more fitting wouldn't you say SL? LMAO ! -- btw -- Crow is low carb... and lf too... ! Excellent post jeanessa |
|
|
|
|
|
#2139 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by Tanner : 11-29-2007 at 11:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2140 |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2141 |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
One of the other nurses who worked with me in ICU had alopecia... but most people would never have guessed she was bald. I worked with her for over a year before I found out. I complimented her on her hair one day, told her it always looked so sharp. She just laughed and said "don't you know? It's a wig!" She then told me about her alopecia. I was so surprised, because I would never have guessed.
I think it was the way she acted and carried herself. She was so confident and classy. She had her own "look", it was unique and she capitalized on it. She was very trim with a cute figure, and always dressed sharp. She wore a really cute wig, it was red hair with amazing highlights ... and her wig was very styled... she wore it cut into a cute, classy, "up to the minute" hair-cut. Her wig didn't look like an over-powering mass of hair sitting on her head like Heidi's does, instead it looked like something out of one of those hairdresser's magazines. I think because this nurse took the "less is more" approach with her wig, it looked more natural. She did have a thin fringe of bangs to disguise that she had no eyebrows... and she wore kind of smokey-lensed glasses to hide her eyelashes. But she was so confident and classy... we all admired her. And guys always tried to flirt with her. |
|
|
|
|
#2142 | |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
Quote:
Oh duh, what was I thinking??? I forgot Kimmer is Jaclyn smith. Last edited by HoneyBee2 : 11-30-2007 at 12:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2143 | ||
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
There is a thread asking where Tippy is lately....
AmyB posted at Kimkins: Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2144 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 143
Gallery: McLurkypants
Stats: WLS 3/28/05 351/175/175
WOE: Protein forward
Start Date: 3/28/05
|
FYI, a copy (PDF) of the "demurrer" filed by Hidey & Kim Kims is up on the court website now. It's 14 pages long and long story short: they basically claim that the complaint "fails to state a claim"as to class status, and each of the major claims made in the Complaint. Some of the details are infuriating to read - if I can find some time tomorrow I'll try and do a little summary.
I interpret this as a stalling tactic - they claim the complaint was not specific enough for them to even answer. Personally, I think it's a bunch of crap, more game-playing, stalling. The arguments are paper thin (along with the legal citations to back them up) and if you get the big picture (as I'm sure the judge will), it's clear they're just squirming around & stalling for time to get out of filing an answer. Also, this injects a (needless) step into the litigation. This document does not appear to be the same quality of work that's being done for the Plaintiffs AT ALL - in my humble opinion. |
|
|
|
|
#2145 | |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
Quote:
We would love any insight you are able to summarize from the court files. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2146 | |
|
Allergic to Carbs- I break out in Fat!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 33,844
Gallery: Diana
Stats: 176.5/138.8/134 (5'3")
WOE: Atkins
Start Date: 8/11/03 Restart 4/08
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2147 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Quote:
Gosh, I hope not. I've never heard of fraud and lies being symptoms of OCD. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2148 | |
|
Allergic to Carbs- I break out in Fat!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 33,844
Gallery: Diana
Stats: 176.5/138.8/134 (5'3")
WOE: Atkins
Start Date: 8/11/03 Restart 4/08
|
Quote:
Oh girl you are in so deep!!! Last edited by Diana : 11-30-2007 at 03:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2149 |
|
Allergic to Carbs- I break out in Fat!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 33,844
Gallery: Diana
Stats: 176.5/138.8/134 (5'3")
WOE: Atkins
Start Date: 8/11/03 Restart 4/08
|
She DID NOT want to come clean, she was forced too since everyone was all over it and figured he scam out. Those in the Kimpire will also fall with her.... maybe this is really why Typotippy took time off, that and no longer getting paid... LOL
|
|
|
|
|
#2150 | |
|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
|
Quote:
Lauren!!!----------------------------- I wanted to post that I have been "banned" from K/K since posting this on the last fascination thread: It seems that I have finally been brought up here. Here's the short version of my story: Atkins-like eating got me from 122 to 104 in three months last year. Kimkins-like eating then got me from 104-98. I only began with binge-eating issues after eating such low calories. (PB being my very favorite binge food). I now maintain at 102, which seems a healthy weight for me, as I am quite small boned. I still struggle with PB issues. The reason I'm leaving the maintenance forum is because I feel that too mainy "maintainers" cannot accept healthy fats or carbs. *And that is exactly the mentality that I am trying to free myself from. Thanks to those of you who have supported me here! ***I could truly care less, since I have refused to post over there for months. -------------------------------------- I seldom post here, but had to say hi to Rebecca. Hi, Rebecca! ETA: Rebecca, you might get a chuckle out of this. Or not. Kimmer always pushed to make you an Admin. I always tried to kill that idea, for your sake. Remember when we were emailing, and I was encouraging you to step down as a new Admin? I was emailing with many people, who all ended up refusing or resigning as Admins. Kimmer lost a lot of her first, second, and third picks before she ended up with the crew she has now. Anyway, when Christin told Kimmer she was stepping down, Kimmer answered back that it was fine, because she would just make you the lead Admin. Then, the very next email in Christin's inbox was from you, declining the Admin position. ![]() ![]() ![]() Just think --- you could have been Tippy or SingingLass. I am SO glad you had better judgment! I wish you all the best! _____________________________________ Thank you for sharing that with me, Becky. And thanks for your well wishes. I wish you all of the best, too! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2151 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2152 |
|
Senior LCF Member
|
Thanks for the welcome JoanieOrchard, Mrsmenopausal, Tanner and Momof2boys, I had to make dinner for DH and then watch King Arthur on Teevee.
Lola, I was shocked by the VLCD, but I knew I could do it for a short period...I don't think I really did KK at all but tweaked it to my lifestyle. Not M&M, fish and wine!! By the way, I started med school at age 38...that put me in residency at 42! Long call nights kicked my butt! Hope you're a youngster! ![]() I never got the whole K/E bit, yuck..and MoM daily? Electrolyte disturbances can occur. I didn't ever comment on that stuff because I know what people will do regardless of my telling them. So I never got banned. McLurky, I'll do some searches for appropriate info for you..get back to you later.. Lauren |
|
|
|
|
#2153 |
|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
|
Just a comment about “… leave individual people alone …”
May be time for people associated with KimKins to lawyer-up! In the eyes of the law, individuals can become public figures (more typically, politicians or celebrities) with limited rights to claim libel or defamation (1964 ruling, U.S. Supreme Court). Common folk can become limited purpose public figures, if they "thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversies ..." Just 'sayin .... cheers, Wendy |
|
|