Why the fascination with Kimmer? #9

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by Elloise

I thought that, too, except for one glaring error.

"I never senses that Kimmer....."

I can't believe that Kimmer would make such a typo, even on purpose. She has impeccable grammer and spelling skills. I don't ever remember her making an error.

Obviously, Kimmer has a sky-high IQ, but what has she done with it? Nothing! What a waste.

Maybe she did that purposely so we would blame TT for the post. She knows we are always kidding TT's grammar!

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by anipomoni

I really hope Deni and Christin point out that they most likely have damaged their metabolisms and will have a struggle to keep this weight off forever. Maybe this will deter people from rushing to join KK.
TT has also damaged her thyroid, but she will never admit that (although I hope to God they bring it up).

I used to watch ER often and I remember Yvette Freeman had lost a TON of weight a few years ago. Well she has since gained a LOT of it back. This was how she lost it:

What should also be interesting is if they are all in the Green Room at the same time. I'd love to be a fly on the wall if that takes place. Maybe they will separate them! If they are all staying at the same hotel - they might run into each other in the lobby or cocktail lounge!

[sbarr]

Interesting, Cheryl (howdy, by the way) - I don't have the stamina to keep up with this thread, but I'll be interested to watch and see how this goes. I'm totally a by-stander on this one, reading up occasionally as one would "Dear Abby" or watching a Lifetime movie or craning a neck to look at a car accident.

It's fascinating and sad that one can profit from claims and duping desperate people who will try anything to lose weight, including jeopardizing their health. Will make for an interesting article at some point, with a timeline and key points summarized - wonder if Women's World would ever have the gumption to do an article on "Diet Scams".

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by sbarr

Interesting, Cheryl (howdy, by the way) - I don't have the stamina to keep up with this thread, but I'll be interested to watch and see how this goes. I'm totally a by-stander on this one, reading up occasionally as one would "Dear Abby" or watching a Lifetime movie or craning a neck to look at a car accident.

It's fascinating and sad that one can profit from claims and duping desperate people who will try anything to lose weight, including jeopardizing their health. Will make for an interesting article at some point, with a timeline and key points summarized - wonder if Women's World would ever have the gumption to do an article on "Diet Scams".

Great idea on WW doing that. Maybe we should contact them. They sure have been quiet about this entire thing. They have been notified. They could still be held accountable - running a story and not even meeting the website founder in person (isn't that called verifying)?

[MJR]

OhYeahBabe wrote:
(6) I oversnipped, but no, I never thought the red dress girl was Kimmer, but she's the one who said it was - over and over, with elaborate lies. Apparently you're new.

ETA: I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet. I agree that this is Kimmer, I was just repsonding to the fake points she was trying to score.

OhYeahBabe,
I'm alittle confused.
When you said, "I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet." and then, "I agree that this is Kimmer"
Are you saying that you think I am a sock puppet? (considering I am the one who first posted this here)
As I understand it, you believe the poster of this quoted post is Kimmer. Therefore, in your mind this poster would not be a "sock puppet" for Kimmer, but Kimmer herself.
So whose the sock puppet? The original writer of this quote, or the one who brought it here (me)? Or someone else?
I'm not trying to be snarky here.... just trying to figure out what you meant.
Maybe I am not understanding what you are trying to say, but I assure you I am no sock puppet for Kimmer.
I am here, just like the majority, trying to help bring Kimmer to justice and help expose her for who and what she really is.

[Cutie]

Originally Posted by MJR

OhYeahBabe wrote:
(6) I oversnipped, but no, I never thought the red dress girl was Kimmer, but she's the one who said it was - over and over, with elaborate lies. Apparently you're new.

ETA: I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet. I agree that this is Kimmer, I was just repsonding to the fake points she was trying to score.

OhYeahBabe,
I'm alittle confused.
When you said, "I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet." and then, "I agree that this is Kimmer"
Are you saying that you think I am a sock puppet? (considering I am the one who first posted this here)
As I understand it, you believe the poster of this quoted post is Kimmer. Therefore, in your mind this poster would not be a "sock puppet" for Kimmer, but Kimmer herself.
So whose the sock puppet? The original writer of this quote, or the one who brought it here (me)? Or someone else?
I'm not trying to be snarky here.... just trying to figure out what you meant.
Maybe I am not understanding what you are trying to say, but I assure you I am no sock puppet for Kimmer.
I am here, just like the majority, trying to help bring Kimmer to justice and help expose her for who and what she really is.

of course YOU are not a sock puppet! there are no sock puppets named "Amy"

[HoneyBee2]

This forum may have been described like this earlier and I just overlooked it but look at the area I highlighted.
So now "DR." Mark is qualified to delve into psychological issues?
Wow, I have been seeing the wrong healthcare providers. I could just do a one stop shopping if I had a "Dr" Mark around here.

[MJR]

Originally Posted by Cutie

of course YOU are not a sock puppet! there are no sock puppets named "Amy"

Cutie,
Yesterday, while digging around over there, I noticed someones siggie line had a picture of Betty Boop in it. I just had to giggle when I saw it. Poor thing probably doesn't know the meaning behind it. I wonder if she'll catch any flack over it?
She's Amy too!
Kimmer is no doubt stressing over all the Amys and Ducks!

[MJR]

I think when all this is over and Heidi is behind bars, we're all going to need a place to delve into psychological issues.

Don't know about yours but, I know MY Brain hurts and could use some TLC.

What a ride this is!

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by OhYeahBabe

(1) It started with lies and manipulation.

(2) Eating doesn't work. Starving does.

(3) Inspiration? Via shame?

(4) What color are those glasses you have on?

(5) You are correct. She sits and schemes in silence, while her admin(ions) and sock puppets do all her work.

(6) I oversnipped, but no, I never thought the red dress girl was Kimmer, but she's the one who said it was - over and over, with elaborate lies. Apparently you're new.

ETA: I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet. I agree that this is Kimmer, I was just repsonding to the fake points she was trying to score.

Too funny. I like the commentary.

Originally Posted by ixtapacheryl

Should be interesting to see if the attorney and marketing gal that was on the show Friday will also be on Monday. Maybe not because it is already in litigation.

The marketing person was Audrey Guskey, Ph.D. Here is a link if you are interested in her.
Duquesne University | School of Business

Originally Posted by MJR

OhYeahBabe wrote:
(6) I oversnipped, but no, I never thought the red dress girl was Kimmer, but she's the one who said it was - over and over, with elaborate lies. Apparently you're new.

ETA: I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet. I agree that this is Kimmer, I was just repsonding to the fake points she was trying to score.

OhYeahBabe,
I'm alittle confused.
When you said, "I can't believe I'm responding to a sock puppet." and then, "I agree that this is Kimmer"
Are you saying that you think I am a sock puppet? (considering I am the one who first posted this here)
As I understand it, you believe the poster of this quoted post is Kimmer. Therefore, in your mind this poster would not be a "sock puppet" for Kimmer, but Kimmer herself.
So whose the sock puppet? The original writer of this quote, or the one who brought it here (me)? Or someone else?
I'm not trying to be snarky here.... just trying to figure out what you meant.
Maybe I am not understanding what you are trying to say, but I assure you I am no sock puppet for Kimmer.
I am here, just like the majority, trying to help bring Kimmer to justice and help expose her for who and what she really is.

MJR- You silly rabbit.. I think the sock puppet term was said in regards to Kimmer. Since Kimmer didn't do the post under her name, but rather the screen name of "Cindy", Kimmer is the sock puppet who is using a false on-line identity. OR would that make Heidi a pair of socks....you know pretending to be kimmer who is pretending to be "cindy"

[Chelveston]

Originally Posted by McLurkypants

The green room interview got me thinking (UH OH! Look out!)...

She said for years, the government has been trying to stop this.

<snip>

Some FTC bureaucrat who wants to make a name for himself needs to get hold of this little gem. Hmm. Too bad Monday's a federal holiday.....

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

Doesn't that mean they will be home and able to watch tv?

Fox seems to be promoting this show heavily in our market. I've seen an ad during prime time, and I don't remember that before. I'm sure hoping that there are some Federal employees watching that would be so moved to look into this.

Originally Posted by sbarr

Is Monday confirmed? Is anyone local attending? Will a lawyer notice that she looks like a whale (with grotesque "camel toes" - I've seen those pictures and really should post them on my fridge as a deterrent) and ask - I understand you weight 119# - do you really mean KILOS?

Being a deposition, I doubt that there will be many in attendance. I think the lawyer will be able to distinguish obese from svelte.

Originally Posted by ixtapacheryl

Great idea on WW doing that. Maybe we should contact them. They sure have been quiet about this entire thing. They have been notified. They could still be held accountable - running a story and not even meeting the website founder in person (isn't that called verifying)?

WW had a poor reputation before the KK thing. I think they're keeping their heads down hoping that no one notices them. WW has enough assets to make them an attractive target for litigation, and they want to stay out of the way of that.

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

This forum may have been described like this earlier and I just overlooked it but look at the area I highlighted.
So now "DR." Mark is qualified to delve into psychological issues?
Wow, I have been seeing the wrong healthcare providers. I could just do a one stop shopping if I had a "Dr" Mark around here.

Oooh! PM ryudragon. I'd expect that the investigator would like to see that!

[MJR]

MJR- You silly rabbit.. I think the sock puppet term was said in regards to Kimmer. Since Kimmer didn't do the post under her name, but rather the screen name of "Cindy", Kimmer is the sock puppet who is using a false on-line identity. OR would that make Heidi a pair of socks....you know pretending to be kimmer who is pretending to be "cindy"
__________________

OK OK - I get it!
I told you my head was spinning...

I just wanted to make sure I was understanding this right.
And obviously, I was not!
OhYeahBabe
I am only on my second cup a coffee - please excuse.

[Cutie]

Originally Posted by MJR

Cutie,
Yesterday, while digging around over there, I noticed someones siggie line had a picture of Betty Boop in it. I just had to giggle when I saw it. Poor thing probably doesn't know the meaning behind it. I wonder if she'll catch any flack over it?
She's Amy too!
Kimmer is no doubt stressing over all the Amys and Ducks!

[MJR]

Gotta go take the kids to Recycles Day 2007 event.
Check back in later.
Y'all be good.

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by Chelveston

Oooh! PM ryudragon. I'd expect that the investigator would like to see that!

I sent Mr. Turner his copy yesterday. I am afraid he is going to think I have become an email stalker.

[This time]

I hope if kimmer does leave her hole, that someone takes her pic on monday!!

[Nady]

Originally Posted by ixtapacheryl

Another thought - remember when she was posting how many members she had for her site? Well if the attorney and IRS tries to calculate how much money she made and bases this class action lawsuit and taxes on that amount - won't she be surprised? If she was lying about those numbers on the website (which has since been removed) and someone got a screen shot .... she has to somehow prove she never took in that much money. If I remember correctly those numbers were quite high after the WW article. Did anyone take a screen shot of that page right after the WW article appeared?

From Becky's Blog
Of the 40,000 or more who joined, most never even tried the diet once they actually saw it, and many who did try it did not stick with it long.

Bold mine~ I doubt Heidi will convince anyone that the numbers are wrong~ there are witnesses~ and records~
~~~N

[Jazlyn]

Something sticks in my mind and it really bothers me. The woman who said...I'll be bald but I'll be thin. (or something like that) That is just so warped. Is society that desperate to be thin? And what are you going to do when you gain the weight back and have no hair to boot?

[BamaGal]

Thought this was cute for all you Amy's

[BamaGal]

Originally Posted by Jazlyn

Something sticks in my mind and it really bothers me. The woman who said...I'll be bald but I'll be thin. (or something like that) That is just so warped. Is society that desperate to be thin? And what are you going to do when you gain the weight back and have no hair to boot?

plus more weight and a screwed up metabolism/thyroid/gall bladder to boot

[Chelveston]

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

I sent Mr. Turner his copy yesterday. I am afraid he is going to think I have become an email stalker.

I should have known that you would.

My apologies for forgetting your awesomeness.

Originally Posted by This time

I hope if kimmer does leave her hole, that someone takes her pic on monday!!

It would be fun for the discussion value, but probably anti-climactic after the PI pictures.

D-day is such a great day. If Hidey shows up, it's good. If Hidey doesn't show up, it's good. Poor Hidey, either way, she can't win.

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by Nady

Bold mine~ I doubt Heidi will convince anyone that the numbers are wrong~ there are witnesses~ and records~
~~~N

Great news and I hope you are right. The IRS/attorney/SSI authorities will be happy to hear that - 40,000 x approx $60/apiece = very happy plaintiffs. Refunds/damages/taxes/attorney fees will wipe out her nest egg. Not to mention that government assistance will probably stop. Time to get a "real" job!

Poor TT's salary will probably not exist anymore and hopefully she has been paid in advance. I hope she got an advance on her travel expenses because that might be more "out of pocket" expenses that she will have to eat. Her poor husband is going to be very upset about that.