Why the fascination with Kimmer? #8

[serenity_aus]

Originally Posted by CJane

Nope, this one is a faker, too.

Soz, I was sure there was a poster about this. Or maybe this is the one where someone came in and said "I told you so, but no one would listen"... I know there's something about this one.. hmm will have to go back and research.. but oh which thread, which post.. acckkkk

[juniper01]

Originally Posted by CJane

Nope, this one is a faker, too.

Hi CJ! I miss your scream ducky.....Loved that one! Although.....your now avatar is kinda good to look at! .........drool....

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by centralpa

The transcript of Gary Taubes on LKL last night is here:
CNN.com - Transcripts
I also posted the entire transcript of the panel discussion in the Main Lobby of LCFs.
cheers,
Wendy

Thank you for posting this because I can read now why it was so painful to watch the discussion. I do not envy the person who had to do the transcript of that show.

Originally Posted by MorganMacLeoid

::witch thinks...Oh not in my neighborhood you don't::

Originally Posted by serenity_aus

I believe this lady actually came in here and said it was her

A member by the name of Sleek came in and really didn't comment as to what her post was saying besides the fact that she felt LCF censored too much and if they don't post her comment she had a screen shot. I commented what I thought her intentions were based on her previous posts, but others did not agree, but the member did not comment on exactly what her point was at the time.
But that picture is a fake like most of Kimmer and Kimkins.

Originally Posted by Princess Dieter

If you guys want to hear Gary have more time to speak, watch this YouTube panel diet discussion. Oz moderates, and Ornish is there, but Taubes gets to have his say. Remember, no matter where he goes, if it's part of a group discussion, he will be the controversial one, so he will get flak:
YouTube - Charlie Rose - NUTRITION PANEL

Princess that was great. I luvre me some Gary. He is my new crush and he looks great in this discussion. I thought Oz reacted very differently in this discussion than the one tonight on Larry King Live. Do you think it was Oz's role in this discussion that made him appear more open to listening or is it the fact that Oz has advanced his career since this video and wanted to come off as the person with the correct theory or did he find the fact that Gary now has a book out versus it just being an article as threatening to him (Oz)?...OR something else?

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by centralpa

SMP: I think you are right on target with your post. BTW, I also think that Heidi posts here. JMHO

cheers,
Wendy

You mean like here on this thread????.......or in general still on LCF?

[gettinserious]

The mouths are different on EVERY pic posted in that post. That is how you can truely tell. Lip changes are HARD. Even if you get them done, they never look right (Hello, Tammy Faye, Dolly Parton) its too noticable a difference, too plastic looking. The afters smiles are natural, not plastic, and different from the befores. That is the leading differential in the pics. I think we can all assume they are all fake.

[juniper01]

Originally Posted by MorganMacLeoid

Morgan, Morgan, Morgan.......now that is funny!

[SMP]

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

You mean like here on this thread????.......or in general still on LCF?

For some reason, I don't think she reads and posts here directly, although it would give her a smarmy chuckle to do it just to score off the mods.
I believe she is banned - I know Tippy is - but think this applies only to posting. AFAIK, admins can trace your ISP; so if someone is causing trouble, it's easy enough to set up blocks to sort them out. This is definitely the thread she would read - how else can she keep abreast of what we're doing? Well, I can't tell with my laser vision how many times certain posts are read by various readers (unless we read them right off the page so they go invisible), but we can sometimes tell when OUR messages end up over at KK or otherwise result in discussed changes taking place.In fact, it was some of OUR suggestions that gave birth to the new, improved Kimkins diets. Betcha that burns her up!

[snpage]

I am NOT surprised at all to see this turn of events. I along with a few other people were anti-Kimmer a few years ago. But she had a rabid fanbase that were cazed over her. Her before picture loooked too fishy to me. It looked too recent. She said that the before picture was form 1999 when she posted it around 2004. I've always thought she was a fraud. I know this makes me and sure others feel a lot better who did not buy her validity.

[mama MIA]

I'm thinking, Heidi Diaz shows up in court with bad pants, wig and all. She claims, some crazy gal or friend ' kimmer' stole her name and used her (before) pictures. She has nothing to do with this Kimmer person and what she has done.
The only thing that would link her (HD in court with wig) to Kimmer is her phone records (conversations with Jimmy Mooore) and her computer files. She could say, she had a crazy friend in her house (Kimmer) that used her phone and computer.

The only thing to prove that the HD (in court) is The Kimmer, is if there is a bank account of Kimmer that traces back to her.


(i've made myself dizzy writting this out)

[MorganMacLeoid]

Originally Posted by mama MIA

I'm thinking, Heidi Diaz shows up in court with bad pants, wig and all. She claims, some crazy gal or friend ' kimmer' stole her name and used her (before) pictures. She has nothing to do with this Kimmer person and what she has done.
The only thing that would link her (HD in court with wig) to Kimmer is her phone records (conversations with Jimmy Mooore) and her computer files. She could say, she had a crazy friend in her house (Kimmer) that used her phone and computer.

The only thing to prove that the HD (in court) is The Kimmer, is if there is a bank account of Kimmer that traces back to her.


(i've made myself dizzy writting this out)

Well, there are a few ways they can prove Heidi is Kimmer. First, her ISP records will show connections to Kimkins.com. If she tries to say that she had some crazy person living in her house, she'll have to give "Kimmer" up and provide information - her name, address, etc., which she obviously can't do. I'm sure they'll also ask Brandon if there was a "Kimmer" living there, who she was, etc.

And like you mentioned, Jimmy Moore. They can match Heidi's voice to her podcast interview - in which she clearly states that SHE is Kimmer and SHE is the woman in the red dress.

Not to mention "Kimmer" says that Heidi collects all the money, heh.

There is really no way out of it for her - thankfully. She can't play it like she has no idea who Kimmer is, as Kimmer even said that she was going to visit Heidi recently.. lol. She's boxed herself into a corner with her lies and she'll be proven a fraud before the court in short order.

The more lies she tells, the deeper she digs her hole.

[WildAngel6]

Kimmer and MySpace....

I have found two different MySpace pages for Kimmer.... one using the Lady in Red pic, and one using the lawn chair pic...

MySpace.com - Kimmer - 49 - Female - California - www.myspace.com/kimkins

This is the one she has logged into most recently...

MySpace.com - Kimmer - 47 - Female - BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA - www.myspace.com/kimkins_by_kimmer

This one is the Jessica Alba profile....

I don't suppose a site like MySpace has any rules against posting pictures that aren't really you... but, if you click on the Contact MySpace link at the bottom of the page, you can report "Scams"... under subject select "Reporting Abuse" and then select "Scams" and let them know about the Kimkins Diet Scam.

[gettinserious]

I like the two different ages. 47 and 49. PFFFT! *sees a big ole bird flying in front of the computer screen*

[dlslds]

Originally Posted by WildAngel6

Kimmer and MySpace....

I have found two different MySpace pages for Kimmer.... one using the Lady in Red pic, and one using the lawn chair pic...

MySpace.com - Kimmer - 49 - Female - California - www.myspace.com/kimkins

This is the one she has logged into most recently...

MySpace.com - Kimmer - 47 - Female - BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA - www.myspace.com/kimkins_by_kimmer

This one is the Jessica Alba profile....

I don't suppose a site like MySpace has any rules against posting pictures that aren't really you... but, if you click on the Contact MySpace link at the bottom of the page, you can report "Scams"... under subject select "Reporting Abuse" and then select "Scams" and let them know about the Kimkins Diet Scam.

Interesting on the first link I was curious as to see Kimmers friends, and look who I found on page 4

MySpace.com - Ailsa - 42 - Female - UK - www.myspace.com/ailsauk


looks familiar huh?

[Magicsmom]

Originally Posted by ixtapacheryl

One thing my husband noticed was the amount of possible plaintiffs - 40,000. So they had to put a number in there. Even if you did receive a refund you can still sign up for punitive damages because they are also suing for that. The banned members did not get what they paid for (Life time membership - e-book, etc.)

They are really in deep doo-doo with respect to banning me. There is NOTHING I did on their site that they can point to as a TOS violation - NOTHING! They banned me for what I said HERE and possibly a comment I made about Lesya's photo on Kimkins Exposed. Believe me, that information is getting disseminated to as many sources as I can think of, including the BBB, the Attorney General, the FTC, you name it!

And I make the following statement for the benefit of Tippy and Kimmer, whom I am positive are reading every word written here. After I was banned, I started doing the copy/repost thing - in other words I have reposted things from the Kimpound on this thread, and I did it to piss you off. But I never did it when I still had my membership, and I will never tell where I am getting the information from. That is my business, Tippy! And the reason I am doing it is because you banned me for no good reason! You are keeping me from using the lifetime membership I paid for, and you are in trouble for it.

[Magicsmom]

Originally Posted by WildAngel6

Kimmer and MySpace....

I have found two different MySpace pages for Kimmer.... one using the Lady in Red pic, and one using the lawn chair pic...

MySpace.com - Kimmer - 49 - Female - California - www.myspace.com/kimkins

This is the one she has logged into most recently...

MySpace.com - Kimmer - 47 - Female - BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA - www.myspace.com/kimkins_by_kimmer

This one is the Jessica Alba profile....

I don't suppose a site like MySpace has any rules against posting pictures that aren't really you... but, if you click on the Contact MySpace link at the bottom of the page, you can report "Scams"... under subject select "Reporting Abuse" and then select "Scams" and let them know about the Kimkins Diet Scam.

Oh for the love of God!!! There is no end to that woman's deception!

[Locarb4me]

Originally Posted by Dottie

I don't know why I was thinking about this, but Kimmer had to have spent hundreds of hours doing internet research to keep her lies looking credible.
Look at all the hundreds of posts about skin care and hair care, complete with online and real stores to buy the products she claimed she used.
Look at all the posts about fasting, ketogenics, general nutrition and all that.
All those times she'd disappear for a few days at a time, claiming things with her foster kids and stuff... she must have been researching her 'facts' to make her claims look real...

I've always thought that, too, Dottie. She certainly is a fount of knowledge...too bad she didn't put it to honest use. She could have helped a lot of people. Now, she's just a scummy scammer. What a waste.

[Locarb4me]

Originally Posted by MorganMacLeoid

That is awesome!!

[CJane]

Originally Posted by juniper01

Hi CJ! I miss your scream ducky.....Loved that one! Although.....your now avatar is kinda good to look at! .........drool....

I know! Yummy, huh? Maybe I'll have to make one that rotates all the avatars I've had recently? lol

[Chelveston]

From Thread#7 Post 3023 (posted on 10/15)

Originally Posted by Magicsmom

Don't these people understand that disrupted menstrual cycles are a symptom of anorexia?

From the Kimpound:

Menstrual Cycle & Kimkins 8 Hours, 16 Minutes ago

Hi Dr Mark.... i have a question about menstrual cycles & Low Carb Diets. Since I have been doing Kimkins, about 4 months (including one break when I thought I was pregnant!), my cycle has been very strange. I have been on the OCP Yasmin for a long time with no problems. Since starting Kimkins, I am lucky to go 10 days without a period. This isnt necessarily a problem in itself, but it sure makes it difficult being on the pill. Do you ditch your old pack, and start the next one when the period is over? This sucks because Yasmin costs $20 per month. Is this disruption normal? It wouldnt have surprised me if I wasnt on the Pill.... but I find it odd that this low carb diet seems to "override" the Pill. What does it mean as far as reliability of contraception????!!! I am interested in your thoughts or suggestion on where else to find information on this.

Thanks!


My comment:

"Dr. Mark" has not responded to this post.

Has he answered this one yet?

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by Chelveston

From Thread#7 Post 3023 (posted on 10/15)

Has he answered this one yet?

------------
"This is one of the many things that you will need to work through with your primary while losing weight.

Do not up your dosing of meds or take them more often than prescribed.

Your weight regulation is tied intimately to your endocrine system....ie hormones.
As you change your diet and eating habits (timing of food) so does your end. syst. change. It is essentially a series of monitoring stations throughout your body that measures blood values continually. These values tell it whether to turn on or off hormone production.

As you friends have mentioned above, there is quite a bit of estrogen stored in bodyfat. BC pills work by changing estro. levels in the blood "tricking" your body into thinking it is pregnant. ie, no ovulation, no period.

As your bodyfat is used for calories it liberated estrogen (and other substances toxic and not) into your blood stream......

Reliability does come into question anytime the period is off but much more if you were going too long without a period.

Again, continue takeing as prescribed.

Dr. Mark"

[Mommy2Many]

I'm still not able to view the third kimmer movie - can someone repost an active link, please?

Everyone here who doesn't already know - BCP's aren't as effective if you weigh over 150 lbs, even if you take them religiously every day.... how do I know? Note the MANY that I am mommy to. I've never stopped taking the pill (except once I found out I was pregnant). I asked my M.D. the second time - he said that b/c I'm so fluffy (gotta love the man), the pill's effectiveness is lower - about 80%.

FWIW, I think it's just ammenorhea (lack of period) that is linked to anorexia - not bleeding all the time.

Steph

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by Mommy2Many

I'm still not able to view the third kimmer movie - can someone repost an active link, please?
[.................]
Steph

Try this link for the latest news report on Kimmer/Kimkins
#3 The Kimmer on KTLA