Why the fascination with Kimmer? #5

[Weedydidi]

Originally Posted by Lisa Marie

You could lose weight snorting cocaine - is that worth the weight loss? Just because the weight is coming off doesn't mean that you are doing it in a healthy, long term way.

Actually, I believe crystal meth is better for weight loss.

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by Princess Dieter

This may sound mean, but I think Fawn is just not all there. I truly think she needs therapy or a warm puppy or something. An intervention.

That's just not normal--that hero worship and gushing and St. Kimmer and all--not for an adult female. I'd expect that in a tween, not a grown-up.

I hope something snaps her out of her Heidi/Kimmer worship. It makes my hairs stand on end to read her frothing posts.

The Princess

Hi Princess I meant to welcome you earlier but I was distracted by Russian brides.
But I wanted to say Welcome and to thank you for my title of "Busy Bee" I shall honor the position besowed upon me.

[lowcarbink]

Originally Posted by Boujie

I totally think Fawn is either Kimmer or Brandon.

NO ONE is that much of a brown nose.

Well...maybe Tippy...

I agree!

[Doodle_in_MA]

Originally Posted by Weedydidi

Actually, I believe crystal meth is better for weight loss.

Smartypants

[LosingToLive]

Shhh... did you hear that?

No, really.....stop for a minute.

there it is again .....wait..... don't type !!!

You can only hear it if you're NOT typing.

Give it about an hour ok? Wait... there it is again.
.
.
.
.
***runs back pages to catch up ****

[BobbiOh]

Originally Posted by Weedydidi

Actually, I believe crystal meth is better for weight loss.

That's why it's referred to as an "Ally McMeal" at NA meetings.

[Katinsac]

Originally Posted by lowcarbink

I agree!

well, is she is...she is at Jimmy's site too so they had better watch out!

[missis36]

Yeah but Weedy, meth messes up your teeth. You're better off trying, Kimkins or like say a tapeworm. Or maybe the jaw thing they used to do back in the day wiring a jaw shut or whatever. I mean who cares if I get sick, It's working!

[Doodle_in_MA]

Originally Posted by LosingToLive

Shhh... did you hear that?

No, really.....stop for a minute.

there it is again .....wait..... don't type !!!

You can only hear it if you're NOT typing.

Give it about an hour ok? Wait... there it is again.
.
.
.
.
***runs back pages to catch up ****

Nice try, buddy

[jjones0525]

Hello ladies -

I don't even know where to start with my kudos to you wonderful women!!! I am a lurker, a bona fide lurker, on this and one other low carb board. This kimkins thing brought me out of it just to say that I posted the following on kimkin.com and got banned in approximately 22 seconds (guess the admins were ready tonight after the ownership announcement):

I mean really, after the pictures, then the tv segment , and the russian brides that "Kimmer" used as success stories - who does not see that Kimmer, aka Heidi Diaz, is running as fast away as she can from this elaborate scam that she has created??

Shame on you admins that keep up this charade.

And to those that say "it works and I'm losing weight". You could lose weight snorting cocaine - is that worth the weight loss? Just because the weight is coming off doesn't mean that you are doing it in a healthy, long term way.

I have so much more I want to say but for those that can't see the light for the trees you won't understand what I'm saying anyway. I just hope you get out before you do more damage to your bodies that you don't even realize you are doing, all for the sake of a few numbers on the scale.

Best to you all,
Jennifer


I was never gung-ho kimkins - joined on an impulse (a VERY BAD impulse) - but have been following this every day to see when she goes down and I am very impressed with what you ladies have done!

Jennifer

[Katinsac]

Originally Posted by LosingToLive

Shhh... did you hear that?

No, really.....stop for a minute.

there it is again .....wait..... don't type !!!

You can only hear it if you're NOT typing.

Give it about an hour ok? Wait... there it is again.
.
.
.
.
***runs back pages to catch up ****

gotta love it...

[anipomoni]

Originally Posted by Doodle_in_MA

Hey Tipster, how'dya like to buy some fraud?

Hmmmm I kind of wish that was possible. At this point TT ticks me off more than Heidi. It's like the mothers who know their children are getting molested but cover it up. To me, not protecting innocent people, and beyond that, protecting the CRIMINAL is as bad as actively hurting them.

[Lisa Marie]

Originally Posted by jjones0525

Hello ladies -

I don't even know where to start with my kudos to you wonderful women!!! I am a lurker, a bona fide lurker, on this and one other low carb board. This kimkins thing brought me out of it just to say that I posted the following on kimkin.com and got banned in approximately 22 seconds (guess the admins were ready tonight after the ownership announcement):

I mean really, after the pictures, then the tv segment , and the russian brides that "Kimmer" used as success stories - who does not see that Kimmer, aka Heidi Diaz, is running as fast away as she can from this elaborate scam that she has created??

Shame on you admins that keep up this charade.

And to those that say "it works and I'm losing weight". You could lose weight snorting cocaine - is that worth the weight loss? Just because the weight is coming off doesn't mean that you are doing it in a healthy, long term way.

I have so much more I want to say but for those that can't see the light for the trees you won't understand what I'm saying anyway. I just hope you get out before you do more damage to your bodies that you don't even realize you are doing, all for the sake of a few numbers on the scale.

Best to you all,
Jennifer


I was never gung-ho kimkins - joined on an impulse (a VERY BAD impulse) - but have been following this every day to see when she goes down and I am very impressed with what you ladies have done!

Jennifer

Jennifer!

You Rock!

[flowerpower]

It sounds like Kimmer is this Fawn character you keep quoting.

Kimmer also says she is not Heidi.

Now, my theory is Heidi is just building her insanity defense for this major scam.

According to someone, many posts ago - Heidi's disability is mental. She's now going overboard to prove it still exists.

[Doodle_in_MA]

Originally Posted by jjones0525

Hello ladies -

I don't even know where to start with my kudos to you wonderful women!!! I am a lurker, a bona fide lurker, on this and one other low carb board. This kimkins thing brought me out of it just to say that I posted the following on kimkin.com and got banned in approximately 22 seconds (guess the admins were ready tonight after the ownership announcement):

I mean really, after the pictures, then the tv segment , and the russian brides that "Kimmer" used as success stories - who does not see that Kimmer, aka Heidi Diaz, is running as fast away as she can from this elaborate scam that she has created??

Shame on you admins that keep up this charade.

And to those that say "it works and I'm losing weight". You could lose weight snorting cocaine - is that worth the weight loss? Just because the weight is coming off doesn't mean that you are doing it in a healthy, long term way.

I have so much more I want to say but for those that can't see the light for the trees you won't understand what I'm saying anyway. I just hope you get out before you do more damage to your bodies that you don't even realize you are doing, all for the sake of a few numbers on the scale.

Best to you all,
Jennifer


I was never gung-ho kimkins - joined on an impulse (a VERY BAD impulse) - but have been following this every day to see when she goes down and I am very impressed with what you ladies have done!

Jennifer

Welcome Jennifer!!! Great post. Hmmmmm....22 seconds? Is that a record, ladies?

[missis36]

Hey Jennifer! Welcome! Great post btw.

And woofy, you stole my line buddy hahaha

[RockyMtnAngelEyes]

The PM with Becky keeps coming to my mind.. Where Heid said she could set up a usable forum for the members and be gone... Hmmmmmmm...

Yep, she wasn't lying that time...

[Melly]

Did I mention chat is open? Missi? *taps foot*

[Weedydidi]

Originally Posted by missis36

Yeah but Weedy, meth messes up your teeth. You're better off trying, Kimkins or like say a tapeworm. Or maybe the jaw thing they used to do back in the day wiring a jaw shut or whatever. I mean who cares if I get sick, It's working!

Then there are the sores from trying to pick out the bugs crawling under you skin....but I hear that Kimmer has some sort of skincare regime that she'll send you for the low low price of $189.95.

[jayed]

Originally Posted by LosingToLive

Shhh... did you hear that?

No, really.....stop for a minute.

there it is again .....wait..... don't type !!!

You can only hear it if you're NOT typing.

Give it about an hour ok? Wait... there it is again.
.
.
.
.
***runs back pages to catch up ****

That's pretty clever. But we're on to you!!!

[Mercifully]

Dear Kimkins Members,


Kimkins is now under new ownership. The website will continue business as usual and the planned site upgrades are almost complete.

The Kimkins Affiliate program is growing rapidly and we thank our affiliates for their enthusiastic support. Kimkins will soon welcome their 1000th affiliate!

Exciting new support resources will be announced very soon for Kimkins members. I will be an adviser and members who want to ask weight loss questions can email me at AskKimmer@gmail.com.

Thanks to everyone who has written incredible emails & PMs of support and understanding.

Kimmer







This was at the bottom of my email from Kimkins.com Is that her address?

This message was sent from Kimkins to ;. It was sent from: Kimkins.com, 529 N. McKinley #104-309 , Corona, CA 92879. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below.

[xf89]

Originally Posted by LosingToLive

Shhh... did you hear that?

No, really.....stop for a minute.

there it is again .....wait..... don't type !!!

You can only hear it if you're NOT typing.

Give it about an hour ok? Wait... there it is again.
.
.
.
.
***runs back pages to catch up ****

I just wanted to say to all the newbies and

[Doodle_in_MA]

Originally Posted by anipomoni

Hmmmm I kind of wish that was possible. At this point TT ticks me off more than Heidi. It's like the mothers who know their children are getting molested but cover it up. To me, not protecting innocent people, and beyond that, protecting the CRIMINAL is as bad as actively hurting them.

Tippy may not be on disability for mental illness like Heidi, but I think she's one sandwich short of a picnic for sure.

[missis36]

Originally Posted by Melly

Did I mention chat is open? Missi? *taps foot*

Darlin I've been tryin to load that thing all night since the first time you came in and said so and well how to say this nicely, Dial up blows!

[McLurkypants]

Originally Posted by jayed

this sale is not going to help her.

ETA: Tippy needs to educate herself about conspiracy and accessory after the fact. There are potential criminal charges here as well as the civil action.

From Wikipedia:

Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the United States Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity."

When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.

In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney. Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court, as it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.[2]

There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." The plaintiff must prove the existence of a "criminal enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like most Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or State court. [1]

Both the federal and civil components allow for the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).

Although its primary intent was to deal with organized crime, Blakey said that Congress never intended it to merely apply to the Mob. He once told Time, "We don't want one set of rules for people whose collars are blue or whose names end in vowels, and another set for those whose collars are white and have Ivy League diplomas."[2]


RICO offenses

Under the law, racketeering activity means:

* Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act).
* Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud (emphasis mine), dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and several other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18).
* Embezzlement of union funds.
* Bankruptcy or securities fraud.
* Drug trafficking.
* Money laundering and related offenses.
* Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in entering the country (if the action was for financial gain)
* Acts of terrorism.

Pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity; The Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to follow the continuity plus relationship test in order to determine whether the facts of a specific case give rise to an established pattern. Predicate acts are related if they "have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events." H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. Continuity is both a closed and open ended concept, referring to either a closed period of conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition.