Why the fascination with Kimmer? #4

[ShellyW]

IS sleek saying she lost the weight on kimkins? Her siggy states hoodia and her own way... Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 244
Gallery: Sleek

Stats: Goal 115 Tiny Frame - 5'5
WOE: My Own Way & Hoodia
Start Date: Variable

[conbofan9]

[quote=Sleek;9292830]Ya know I tried to warn people on this board back in May and the MODS here deleted my posts.
Im disgusted that some people mightve skipped kimmer and also saved their health if my posts had been read.

Bye all. Censorship sucks.


QUOTE]

OK here is MY take on what this poor person was saying....back in may she posted those pix ( before and after ) questioning kimmer. She says the mods deleted her post. had there NOT been CENSORSHIP people would have SKIPPED doing kimmer and SAVED their health!! she is saying she tried to warn people here in MAY but her post got deleted....

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by GinaC

Oh yes, if nothing else, our momma's always taught us to be polite!

I was using RESIST DISTRACTION, however maybe this should phrase when someone is attempting to get us to derail..
"Bless Your Heart!"
I think that would be a great way to respond without giving up the thread to those you will not respond to questions or comments.

[kiwi8]

Originally Posted by mrsmenopausal

Wow! I want to cry fowl, too. Bahahhaaa!!!
Okay, hear this ... members were INSTRUCTED to lower calories or INSTRUCTED to follow plans with very low calories by KIMMER/HEIDI herself!! (You may remember her. She started the site and the plans *were based on her claimed success). People joined for her support, guidance, and to achieve the same results so why would they not take what she had to say and follow it? Raise your hand (sorry, couldn't resist) if you signed up for something you knew required tweaking to make it work and make it healthy. Tweaking was FROWNED upon because then it *wasn't KIMKINS. I don't have copies and they're probably gone from the site now, but I'll bet others have copies of post with her telling people to lower, or condoning, already low calories. I read them myself when I was a member there.
As far as any assumed jealousy of TT, let me just state for the record here that although I may not be her size I tend to sum someone up by the kind of person they are and not by how much they weigh or how they look in a bathing suit. Because of this I do not aspire to be a thin person who ... for the sake of TOS lets just say ... makes the choices and does the things that she has.
Now, as far as the encouragement statement goes ... this site is loaded with encouragement and support. And get this. This is the going to shock you but I can ask what I need an answer to without fear or being banned. How about you?

OK lets see if my freedom of speech gets threw this time shall we........
Ok I am not arguing wether or not you were or were not instructed to lower your calorie in take or not, what I am saying is this....if it were children who were being told to do this and going blindly along with what someone told them to do, then that's one thing, way way wrong, ok I strongly agree......however as far as I know you are all adults CORRECT????? I too was told to lower this and that, but my common sense kicked in and said arrrrrr not a good idea. If you were being told to lower your calories to the extreme and you done it blindly, then you must take some of that responsibility too, you can't just start screaming FOWL and yes that does = duck for those late bloomers LOL.....went right over some peoples heads......anyway back on topic......I am not against what you are upset about, I am upset though on some people's ethics on how they have chosen to go about it...... there is no point what so ever in name calling etc etc, and yes I too am guilty of this, I should not have lowered my standards to get my point across, and I sincerely apologize for this.....I am sure we can all be civil to each other.....no doubt a lot of you ladies once supported me, and I you, so lets just agree to disagree on some points......I do fully understand how we can get emotional over things And just to set things straight, I have not got blinders on, I can see what is going on, and as someone was kind enough to enlighten us all on, Yes I have only lost 11 pounds, why because I am not doing 400 cals a day, why because I tried it and I felt it wasn't good for me to do, it was way to extreme for me, but some people think that is ok.....but bottom line here, wether we agree or disagree, it is their own business how they chose to eat.......I knew way way way before I ever entered KK that 300-400 cals a day was not a good idea, and you can't tell me that none of you were aware of this too.......come on ladies, take a little bit of responsibility here........
Have a nice day everyone

[HoneyBee2]

[quote=conbofan9;9293081]

Originally Posted by Sleek

Ya know I tried to warn people on this board back in May and the MODS here deleted my posts.
Im disgusted that some people mightve skipped kimmer and also saved their health if my posts had been read.

Bye all. Censorship sucks.


QUOTE]

OK here is MY take on what this poor person was saying....back in may she posted those pix ( before and after ) questioning kimmer. She says the mods deleted her post. had there NOT been CENSORSHIP people would have SKIPPED doing kimmer and SAVED their health!! she is saying she tried to warn people here in MAY but her post got deleted....

But I am confused then why the warning in May but the return in August to talk on another thread about her doing Kimkins?

[GinaC]

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

I was using RESIST DISTRACTION, however maybe this should phrase when someone is attempting to get us to derail..
"Bless Your Heart!"
I think that would be a great way to respond without giving up the thread to those you will not respond to questions or comments.

Great idea! I was thinking that we needed a signal when they visit.

[missis36]

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

Missi I think she is attempting to say:

1)that things here were censored??? To hint at SL's being censored or other kimkins posters over here.
Umm..ok well that might be true in some cases, but why would they censor Singinglass's replies to questions but not her excuses and story telling?
That doesn't make sense. Oh I get it now..... See since Tippy and Kimmer can't post someone has to.


Also Sleek could have been back to warn before now....like on 8/08/07 you could have posted here about your concerns instead of posting about how Kimkins makes you "look downright slinky in two weeks"How much can I lose in 2 weeks?

2)The pics are to show us how great Kimkins is I imagine by helping her lose weight.

But Bless your Heart Sleek for trying!

Hey HOney, you are a doll, and totally awesome...have I mentioned that?

[Crohnie]

[quote=conbofan9;9293081]

Originally Posted by Sleek

Ya know I tried to warn people on this board back in May and the MODS here deleted my posts.
Im disgusted that some people mightve skipped kimmer and also saved their health if my posts had been read.

Bye all. Censorship sucks.


QUOTE]

OK here is MY take on what this poor person was saying....back in may she posted those pix ( before and after ) questioning kimmer. She says the mods deleted her post. had there NOT been CENSORSHIP people would have SKIPPED doing kimmer and SAVED their health!! she is saying she tried to warn people here in MAY but her post got deleted....

alot of posts were deleted when Kimmer was questioned over the years. Sorry to say. And Sleek is right and we usually agree to disagree

[2big4mysize]

hey missi maybe she is spelling it bad cause she knows it drives you nuts and she can't come do it in person cause she is baned

[HoneyBee2]

Originally Posted by missis36

Hey HOney, you are a doll, and totally awesome...have I mentioned that?

Thank you sweetie and backathca!

[tiggerr]

Originally Posted by conbofan9

[she is saying she tried to warn people here in MAY but her post got deleted....

*Looks in Dottie's and Cheri's direction*

They'll know.

[missis36]

Originally Posted by kiwi8

OK lets see if my freedom of speech gets threw this time shall we........
Ok I am not arguing wether or not you were or were not instructed to lower your calorie in take or not, what I am saying is this....if it were children who were being told to do this and going blindly along with what someone told them to do, then that's one thing, way way wrong, ok I strongly agree......however as far as I know you are all adults CORRECT????? I too was told to lower this and that, but my common sense kicked in and said arrrrrr not a good idea. If you were being told to lower your calories to the extreme and you done it blindly, then you must take some of that responsibility too, you can't just start screaming FOWL and yes that does = duck for those late bloomers LOL.....went right over some peoples heads......anyway back on topic......I am not against what you are upset about, I am upset though on some people's ethics on how they have chosen to go about it...... there is no point what so ever in name calling etc etc, and yes I too am guilty of this, I should not have lowered my standards to get my point across, and I sincerely apologize for this.....I am sure we can all be civil to each other.....no doubt a lot of you ladies once supported me, and I you, so lets just agree to disagree on some points......I do fully understand how we can get emotional over things And just to set things straight, I have not got blinders on, I can see what is going on, and as someone was kind enough to enlighten us all on, Yes I have only lost 11 pounds, why because I am not doing 400 cals a day, why because I tried it and I felt it wasn't good for me to do, it was way to extreme for me, but some people think that is ok.....but bottom line here, wether we agree or disagree, it is their own business how they chose to eat.......I knew way way way before I ever entered KK that 300-400 cals a day was not a good idea, and you can't tell me that none of you were aware of this too.......come on ladies, take a little bit of responsibility here........
Have a nice day everyone

Oh sweet mother of gawd, I got 3 sentences in and the spelling and grammer kicked me in the head.

Btw, it's not threw it's THROUGH, and I'd go THROUGH the rest of your post but I think I'd lose brain cells, so I can't. But thanks.

ETA: The sleek thing was just debunked by Honey.

And also Kiwi BLESS YOUR HEART!

[Puppy]

[quote=conbofan9;9293081]

Originally Posted by Sleek

Ya know I tried to warn people on this board back in May and the MODS here deleted my posts.
Im disgusted that some people mightve skipped kimmer and also saved their health if my posts had been read.

Bye all. Censorship sucks.


QUOTE]

OK here is MY take on what this poor person was saying....back in may she posted those pix ( before and after ) questioning kimmer. She says the mods deleted her post. had there NOT been CENSORSHIP people would have SKIPPED doing kimmer and SAVED their health!! she is saying she tried to warn people here in MAY but her post got deleted....

That's what I got.

Also -The lanyard when zoomed in upon says "Universal Ampitheater 30th Anniversary." A quick internet search reveals that this event took place in 2002. I think Sleek's point is that those before and after pics. are totally bogus b/c KK wasn't even a site at that point so how could that be the after.

Imagine some bogus pics?

[dlslds]

Originally Posted by emily1965

That's right. I posted about it in the first thread. I'll go see if I can dig up that post to remember what it said.....be right back.


ETA: I'm back. "the after pic shows a girl wearing a tag around her neck. If you blow up in photoshop it says Universal Amphitheatre 30th Anniversary.
The Universal Amphitheare in Universal City turned 30 in 2002".

aha!!!!!!!!!!!

Emily GodBless your beautiful brain cells!!!!

[Sheridan]

Originally Posted by GinaC

Hey Sheridan Got your back. Carry on!

Thanks!

Originally Posted by Doodle_in_MA

I was wondering where you were Seriously though...how screwed up is Tippy to be saying and doing these things???

Payin' work to tend to, gal!

I'm not sure if it's as much screwed up as it is desperation. Or something.

(Tryin' hard to behave)

[missis36]

Puppy See Honey's post, if that was sleeks opinion of this, why did she praise the kk woe in August? Me thinks more diversion!

[JustKim]

Originally Posted by kiwi8

OK lets see if my freedom of speech gets threw this time shall we........
Ok I am not arguing wether or not you were or were not instructed to lower your calorie in take or not, what I am saying is this....if it were children who were being told to do this and going blindly along with what someone told them to do, then that's one thing, way way wrong, ok I strongly agree......however as far as I know you are all adults CORRECT????? I too was told to lower this and that, but my common sense kicked in and said arrrrrr not a good idea. If you were being told to lower your calories to the extreme and you done it blindly, then you must take some of that responsibility too, you can't just start screaming FOWL and yes that does = duck for those late bloomers LOL.....went right over some peoples heads......anyway back on topic......I am not against what you are upset about, I am upset though on some people's ethics on how they have chosen to go about it...... there is no point what so ever in name calling etc etc, and yes I too am guilty of this, I should not have lowered my standards to get my point across, and I sincerely apologize for this.....I am sure we can all be civil to each other.....no doubt a lot of you ladies once supported me, and I you, so lets just agree to disagree on some points......I do fully understand how we can get emotional over things And just to set things straight, I have not got blinders on, I can see what is going on, and as someone was kind enough to enlighten us all on, Yes I have only lost 11 pounds, why because I am not doing 400 cals a day, why because I tried it and I felt it wasn't good for me to do, it was way to extreme for me, but some people think that is ok.....but bottom line here, wether we agree or disagree, it is their own business how they chose to eat.......I knew way way way before I ever entered KK that 300-400 cals a day was not a good idea, and you can't tell me that none of you were aware of this too.......come on ladies, take a little bit of responsibility here........
Have a nice day everyone

okay - if you want bygones to be bygones...what name did you USED to use??

[MyCannelloni]

Originally Posted by Yelnats

You may not have heard about it on this board because at that time Kim was still the "enemy" for being at Kimkins....

And, if I recall correctly, there were a lot of people here at the time who either vouched for Kim or were scratching their heads wondering why she was still with Heidi (since they knew Kim to be of better character). I never got the impression that Kim was considered an enemy over here. I would have been sad if that had been my impression.

[wifezilla]

Ok KIWI,

I'll bite.

It was explained to these women that since they were carrying body fat, they had all the calories they needed right on them. Of course, this was wrong, but they were LIED TO!

The responsibility is with KIMMER for LYING!

[jayed]

Originally Posted by HoneyBee2

But I am confused then why the warning in May but the return in August to talk on another thread about her doing Kimkins?

Resist Distraction!

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by missis36

Ok has anyone posted this nugget yet?



Um, tippy. Why can't she learn to spell THEIR??? and the whole i before e thing is lost on them.

Dead giveaway isn't it?

[JustKim]

Originally Posted by MyCannelloni

And, if I recall correctly, there were a lot of people here at the time who either vouched for Kim or were scratching their heads wondering why she was still with Heidi (since they knew Kim to be of better character). I never got the impression that Kim was considered an enemy over here. I would have been sad if that had been my impression.

Yelnats I am confused. And considering you are talking about me...I have no idea what you are actually talking about.

sorry I didn't know how to quote within a quote so it ended up only quoting MyCannelloni

[missis36]

Originally Posted by JustKim

Yelnats I am confused. And considering you are talking about me...I have no idea what you are actually talking about.

sorry I didn't know how to quote within a quote so it ended up only quoting MyCannelloni

Kim yelnats was saying that basically everyone over there knew you had been threatened, and that we wouldn't have known about it cuz you were the enemy, but you were never the enemy so we are confused.