Why the fascination with Kimmer? #2

[CJane]

Originally Posted by mistyk

Yeah, that was weird, wasn't it? I guess you were talking about the domain info and somehow got copied??? Too bad Truth didn't edit your name out. Hope this doesn't cause you any problems.

BTW... notice that it says wettybauer99/Lisa J.... doesn't Lisa J. post on here and didn't she get really angry when people suggested she worked at Kimkins or something like that????

It made my stomach turn when I saw it, and to think it was sent that way to that...(don't want to get banned, so I'll say...) woman! I don't remember talking about the domain info at all, but I must have made a comment to the poster who it was copied from, and she was thanking me for something...I dunno what.

I don't think it will pose any problems, other than some may look at my name and wonder if I'm on the up and up. That does kind of bother me, because I'm a real straight shooter, and I'm definitely NOT on Kimmer's side.

[aloise]

I'm going to post this again ...

from this original





Look at the profiles, especially the nose, mouth:

[RockyMtnAngelEyes]

Originally Posted by CJane

It made my stomach turn when I saw it, and to think it was sent that way to that...(don't want to get banned, so I'll say...) woman! I don't remember talking about the domain info at all, but I must have made a comment to the poster who it was copied from, and she was thanking me for something...I dunno what.

I don't think it will pose any problems, other than some may look at my name and wonder if I'm on the up and up. That does kind of bother me, because I'm a real straight shooter, and I'm definitely NOT on Kimmer's side.

CJane, I didn't question it at all.. I knew it had to be something else, not that you are involved like that...

[JoanieOrchard]

Originally Posted by controlledcarb

This is all she has on her disclaimer page:

Disclaimer
Please consult your health care provider before starting this or any diet. Kimkins is not suitable for anyone who is pregnant, nursing, or with impaired kidney function.

I'm no doctor, and I don't claim to know much about medicine, but if I opened a web site with a diet program, I'd want a doctor to go out on a limb to say whether the program was safe or wasn't.

Just posting that disclaimer makes me wonder, since she has nothing to back up whether the diet is or isn't healthy, how can she even put up a disclaimer saying pregnant, nursing, or people with impaired kidney function shouldn't be on the diet?

I can see a disclaimer saying you should see your doctor first before beginning any diet program, but to single out groups of people makes it almost sound like it's a doctor recommendation when it really isn't.

It's only Kimmer's amateur opinion. And that opinion isn't worth any more than the rest of her diet.

What doctor has evaluated this diet to say whether it is or isn't safe?

[jenna...]

Originally Posted by aloise

I'm going to post this again ...

from this original





Look at the profiles, especially the nose, mouth:

WOW...a TOTAL MATCH and we know Kimmer/Hiedi have been on record saying that was her(s) before picture.

.

[sallyk]

Changed my avi from a nice cozy cabin and jammies to a ducky one!

[Sherrie_lc]

Originally Posted by RenoMom

LOL, we’re fine! Heidi Diaz has been on the website for checks for a year. It wasn’t a secret. If they want to go down the wrong path, that’s up to them. Personally, I would have done it differently, but who am I to criticize.

Remember Slamboard is my former partner’s husband. They’re mad they lost out on 50% of the $$$ from the magazine. That’s what this is about.

Geesh This lady is a moron. She's too dumb to keep up with her own lies. So now she is feeling sorry for "Heidi" and trying to state that we are on the wrong path, LOL. Then in the next paragraph she states that Catherines DH is her x partners DH! Um She was Heidis partner. Okay this lady cracks me up!

ROFLMAO

[CJane]

Originally Posted by RockyMtnAngelEyes

CJane, I didn't question it at all.. I knew it had to be something else, not that you are involved like that...

Thank you, Kiki. I appreciate that!

[Katinsac]

Originally Posted by suzanne13

That is what I wanted to know. I don't want to participate if I don't qualify and don't want to take away from those who legitimately have been de-frauded.

Suzanne...just contact the lawyer and ask him. And welcome...come on bye anytime, we are glad to have you!

[CarolynF]

Sherrie: You do have sharp eyes, my dear..And NO ONE ever made their checks out to Kimmer, did they???? Cuz she doesn't exist aside from Heidi.

Maybe Heidi has a Magic Chair that turns her into Kimmer when she types at the computer??

CJane..We all knew it had to be "glitch" in the copy/paste stuff.

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by jenna...

WOW...a TOTAL MATCH and we know Kimmer/Hiedi have been on record saying that was her(s) before picture.

.

IDENTICAL - A MATCH!!!! How anyone can deny that they are one in the same is beyond comprehension!

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by CJane

It made my stomach turn when I saw it, and to think it was sent that way to that...(don't want to get banned, so I'll say...) woman! I don't remember talking about the domain info at all, but I must have made a comment to the poster who it was copied from, and she was thanking me for something...I dunno what.

I don't think it will pose any problems, other than some may look at my name and wonder if I'm on the up and up. That does kind of bother me, because I'm a real straight shooter, and I'm definitely NOT on Kimmer's side.

I was wondering if and when this was going to happen... So now they are pretending to be other people ....

[SinKittyVixen]

Yes, that is such a match. Its her.She needs to come clean. Stop the insanity.
~Kasey

[cgkane]

Originally Posted by mistyk

I have to say... I don't think we were all naive so much as hopeful. We have all struggled to lose weight, many of us for years and years. As honest people, we had no reason to think someone else is being dishonest. Add to that the fact that the weight loss miracle appeared in a national mag-- well, gosh, it might as well be straight from God's mouth. I know, I know... people lie, even magazines, but we had no reason to think that way BACK THEN... But boy, try to lie to any of us now. I, for one, am not going to believe anything I read from here on out.

I feel the same way.
I had successfully done a low carb plan about 7 years ago. But when I read about Kimkins...I just knew it would help me lose the extra weight before my 10th anniversary.

All it has done is given me a borderline ED. Even though I haven't followed it in a few months, I still mentally beat myself up for eating cheese. Or using more than a drop of salad dressing on a salad. Or using oil/butter to cook with.
I still have trouble adding veggies back, averaging a small salad a day.
I still fret I may be eating too many calories.
I *never* ever had this problem before.

I wonder about my thyroid. Has it been affected? Is the extra hair loss I've been experiencing the past few months a result of this? What about the horrendous cramps? Has Kimkins messed up my hormones as well?

I signed the petition the day it came out. Thank goodness Heidi didn't receive any money from me. But she did get a part of my sanity.

So to all of you who are tirelessly working to expose her- I applaud you.

*back to catching up on thread*

P.S. Sorry Jayed- looks like we have the same duck!

[Kona sunset]

Hey! Will ya'll slow down? I'm tryin' to catch up here. My DH tells me I'm obsessed. I told him this is like reading a very long novel that just keeps getting longer.

I'm way back on page 73. Just wanted to respond to some things from even further back...

Originally Posted by LosingToLive

Ok I have a question.....

Can you collect disability and also have a job? She worked at Huges Aircraft for 4 1/2 years. She said that she had collected disability for five years and that was written in 94.

this is on a handwritten legal form.

Someone responded to this and suggested she might be using aliases. Could be. However, it is possible to work a limited amount and collect SSDI. I think it was stated somewhere that she is on SSI, though, and if that is the case, whatever she makes would be deducted from her check. I think she's gonna need a LOT of money to pay back the govt. That would be us.

Originally Posted by Piekinns

If any one is puzzled how heidikin could get away with using various false ID's , in Los Angeles Co and much of So. California we have an enormous immigrant population.....a large number of the immigrants are not here legally ( I'm not judging, just stating a fact ) and they do not have ss#'s.

Since there are millions of people here with no ss#'s most agencies do not investigate blatantly fraudulent documents, if fact many agencies are not even allowed to ask for proof of ID .....very fertile ground for heidikin

"Most agencies". What about the foster care agencies? Are they so desparate they don't check people out thoroughly? We even get fingerprinted here. I don't know what I've done to my fingers, but they have a tough time getting my prints. I still can't believe she had foster kids when she lost custody of her son and then got more after having them taken away? What's up with that?

Originally Posted by emmyjane

That is SO true for me too! It's crazy, isn't it? I was hoping it would have all been pretty much wrapped up by September... what if it goes on for months and months more... aaaaack!

Originally Posted by DivaHerself

Oh, it will. Because you can access Riverside County court minutes online.

Originally Posted by CarolinaRocker

I dug up this thread from 2004...about Woman's World.

Could it be that Heidi was planning this for years....interesting.

http://www.lowcarbfriends.com/bbs/ma...ne-writer.html

this statement sounds an awful lot like the articles on her own website:

Particularly deceiving is when they'll write an article, quote a doctor, end the quote but continue in the same paragraph with other conclusions. At first it reads as though the quoted doctor is making the statements. They are not. Not everyone reads (or is willing to) read a piece several times to figure out who said what.

she musta learned from their example.

Yeah, that's what got me about the article. That's exactly what they did. I didn't read it enough times BEFORE I joined.

Originally Posted by Mrs. Steve

I made a ton of graphics for the members there. All the members were very sweet, and appreaciative for the little awards that motivated them. I was banned for: members complaints. I KNOW that's a bunch of crap! I can't wait till this is all over, and K gets what's coming to her.
I look forward to getting to know you all.

So, what happened to your graphics? Did you take them down? Cuz they're being resurrected! SL has asked people to repost them if they have some.

Posted by SL:

As some of you may have noticed, we lost the rewards bank....and thus all the rewards stored on it. We know how much those little rewards mean to everyone, and so in an attempt to restore the rewards bank, we are requesting that anyone who has those graphics personally stored somewhere---computer, signature etc....to post them in this thread, so that we can gather and re-host them. Please take note to see if anyone has posted the same graphic before you just avoid confusion.

There was some discussion about whether it was a copyright infringement to use them. SL said they were "checking into it." Later, she posted:

That is why we have not put them back up as of yet, she did not leave any instructions either way.....and they are not being used for commercial purposes.

The panties and such look to me like they may have even just been photoshopped from like catalog images and had the pounds typed over them.....so not like they are original art...not with hello kitty and stuff printed on them.

I am going to download photoshop and tinker and see if i can get some basic ones out at least while I work on the hand-drawn faries as well. Sorry for the confusion, and I appreciate all of your patience while we try to figure it all out.

Back to trying to catch up!

[CJane]

Originally Posted by ixtapacheryl

I was wondering if and when this was going to happen... So now they are pretending to be other people ....

Well, not this time...it was copied from a real comment on LCF...someone was thanking me for something at the top of the comment and the rest of the comment was where the info was that the KK side wanted. My name got copied in the whole kit and caboodle. No one was trying to pretend they were me. Here's the comment that was copied and sent to Heidi: link.

Carolyn F. - thank you!

[Lilgrnize]

Finally caught up again...

Missi, I don't think you suck...I respect your decision and admire your integrity! We all know the truth will come out when the time is right. Thanks for all your hard work in making that happen!

Kakay, as far as the KK admins, I don't think $$$ is the lure. I think it's obvious that they are enticed by what they perceive as power and status. I also wonder why, if they believe so strongly in their choice, they aren't eager to defend that choice.

[Violet Skye]

CJane..We all knew it had to be "glitch" in the copy/paste stuff.

What Carolyn said! Anyone who *knows you* knows better than to think you were incriminated in this mess.

ETA that missi, you made the right decision in not letting innocent people get caught in the crossfire. I wouldn't want our quest for the truth to get as ethically-challenged as what we were trying to shut down! It may take longer to get info, but I will sleep better knowing that the rights of innocent people are being looked after.

[jayed]

Originally Posted by LINC

No, there's not. Everyone has to report non-employee compensation over $600. It's a federal law.

An FYI regarding Heidi and her use of contractors....unless the contractors are located in CA, they do not fall under CA jurisdiction. The labor law in their state would apply. Each state has varying levels of leniency when it comes to classification of employee vs contractor. From what these people do, they could very well be legitimately classified as contractors. All it would take to start a state investigation into that would be for anyone who worked for her to make an unemployment claim in their state. The unemployment department would send a notice to Kimkins demanding details about the work that person did for her and what they were paid. If the state deems that they were an employee, Kimkins would be responsible for all the state employment taxes, and in some states, she'd have to prove that the company also had disability and/or worker's compensation policies. That's assuming Kimkins is incorporated. I have no idea how they would treat an individual in that situation.

Lou

Just to clarify, I was referring to CA's minimum wage laws not whether a company has to report employee earnings.

[MacNut]

Originally Posted by controlledcarb

However.....

If she has employees (or contractors) she needs to file for and receive an employer ID number.....have worker's compensation insurance for anyone who is an employee and pay that quarterly.....have unemployment insurance for any employees and pay that quarterly......and pay fees to her city/county for business registration, taxes owed to same, and pay state taxes as owed in addition to fedeal taxes. She's in deep-doo-doo....she still hasn't registered her company with Corona....let alone all the other things she failed to do!

Not true. We are not incorporated and have no tax ID# other than a SS#. We pay contractors and send them a 1099 at the end of the year. We do not need to have worker's comp on any of them or unemployment insurance.

If you don't register your company, you get a bill later and it is a nominal fee.

[ixtapacheryl]

Originally Posted by CJane

Well, not this time...it was copied from a real comment on LCF...someone was thanking me for something at the top of the comment and the rest of the comment was where the info was that the KK side wanted. My name got copied in the whole kit and caboodle. No one was trying to pretend they were me. Here's the comment that was copied and sent to Heidi: link.

Carolyn F. - thank you!

Ok now I get it ..... It can get confusing especially for a "senior citizen" ..... that's me...

[aloise]

interesting... ducky should be proud. The kimkinsexposed name is popular enough that another enterprising company has snatched it up as a domain name.

I wonder what ducky or heidi will think of the new website with the domain name kimkinsexposed...

[JoanieOrchard]

Originally Posted by aloise

interesting... ducky should be proud. The kimkinsexposed name is popular enough that another enterprising company has snatched it up as a domain name.

I wonder what ducky or heidi will think of the new website with the domain name kimkinsexposed...