![]() |
|
|
|
#214 |
|
Sugar High Hooligan
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crazy Town
Posts: 38,255
Gallery: CarolinaRocker
Stats: - 15.5
WOE: LowCarb 7-21-08
|
I guess I did the math wrong the other day...sorry!
I wonder if they all water fast and master clense like she does to maintain ![]() Last edited by CarolinaRocker : 07-02-2007 at 07:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
Way too much time on my hands!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oregon coast
Posts: 22,834
Gallery: LindaJ
Stats: 172/162/140 5'7" age 59
WOE: Atkins lifestyle
Start Date: August 2000
|
The original controversy about Kimmer was that she insisted she started at over 300 pounds when her photo didn't look near that big.
The blue eyes/brown eyes thing is weird. |
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Sugar High Hooligan
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crazy Town
Posts: 38,255
Gallery: CarolinaRocker
Stats: - 15.5
WOE: LowCarb 7-21-08
|
I like the cartoon version of myself too
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#220 |
|
Blabbermouth!!!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boston, then OH, then NYC, now SoCal. Whew!
Posts: 17,240
Gallery: Ntombi
Stats: original:325+/259.6/180? restart:325/---/180?
WOE: Atkins works when I work it.
Start Date: Original: 8-23-02 Restart: over and OVER and OVER!
|
I wonder how she'll get out of going on the cruise.
|
|
|
|
|
#221 |
|
Big Yapper!!!!
|
Can a plastic sturgeon make a nose longer? the leopard painting the
nose looks longer, picture # 3 and # 4 aren't even close in resemblance, # 2 and the leopard might look close if it weren't for the nose being longer and the face longer, it does look like someone tried to make # 2 into a painting but got some of the features wrong (nose, face length. # 3 & # 4 are strangers, different noses, too, # 4 looks like she has a slight chin dimple, too. Kind of weird, I'd be embarrassed! |
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Big Yapper!!!!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 8,051
Gallery: silkandsand
Stats: 148/138/125 sizes:8/6-4
WOE: Atkins/Low carb
Start Date: 2/2/2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
#223 | |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
|
Quote:
The pics may or may not be all of her. I do know that professional makeup and hair styling, lighting and photographing, and the touching up of those photos, can make anyone look better/worse/blonde/not-so-blonde/smooth skin/beginning to wrinkle, etc. and even so different that they only slightly appear to resemble the person you once saw a picture of. Regardless of it all, Kimmer spent several years here answering questions over and over and over and allowing everyone to pour over her fitday entries. She freely told her story and why she took the weight loss path that she chose and that worked for her. And she freely shared her methods and beliefs with anyone who wanted to pick her brain. And anyone was able to go her route to weight loss or not. We all decide whether we want it badly enough to make enough of an effort to actually succeed and how we will proceed toward our weight loss goal. She freely admitted that her "ideas" and her "Kimmer's" eating plan was strongly based on the written plans of others before her (Atkins, Stillman) and they weren't the first with their ideas either. I am happy to see that she has been able to develop her work into the start of a business that may or may not succeed greatly...only time will tell...but I certainly don't begrudge her anything. She actually went out and shed the fat, and she actually shared how she did it with all of us freely, and she actually went on to turn it into a business. Good for her. There may be some people out there who will follow her direction and find it is the right weight loss regimen for them. Some of you are saying things that sound like echos of what the press always said of Atkins, such as: "It isn't a diet anyone can stick with for the long term", which always makes us fume since we know that the "diet" part is only for the early months while we're losing the fat. We do actually get to eat a bit more and a few more carbs later, ya' know. Anyway, just my thoughts. I've seen too many pics of people that didn't look like them, and too many altered pictures that didn't look like them much but were really them.....I just don't think it's this big scam... |
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
|
Could be professional airbrushing you wouldn't believe what they do to celebrity photos for magazines (ok,you probably would.)
|
|
|
|
|
#226 |
|
Big Yapper!!!!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 8,051
Gallery: silkandsand
Stats: 148/138/125 sizes:8/6-4
WOE: Atkins/Low carb
Start Date: 2/2/2003
|
Did she make her leaving an event? I never knew she left. But I never venture out of the playground. I swim with the sharks.
![]() And melsy...that picture of you doesn't look like any of the kimmers I've seen. |
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 3,831
Gallery: jdprecious
Stats: (220 preg high) 199 after baby/162 now/150 goal
WOE: Moderate Low Carb
Start Date: Over and over since Jan 2003
|
Quote:
i have seen transformations on this board over the years that you would never believe the before and afters were the same person... so why not kimmer? and as a matter of fact, i have seen members of her site lose 100 lbs in 5 months... if she is a scam... she is a damn good one! whether those are real pics are not, most people are just hatin on her because she is making money off what we already know! jmho!!! Last edited by jdprecious : 07-02-2007 at 08:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Sugar High Hooligan
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crazy Town
Posts: 38,255
Gallery: CarolinaRocker
Stats: - 15.5
WOE: LowCarb 7-21-08
|
200 in 11 months. Im not hatin.
|
|
|
|
|
#231 | |
|
Random WIT
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: in the state of desperation
Posts: 48,610
Gallery: stews
Stats: 235/???/135 OR size 20-22/8-10/4-6
WOE: Learning2Lose with Jackie Brown
Start Date: 2/7/00, restarted 4/11/05
|
Quote:
Last edited by stews : 07-02-2007 at 08:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,474
Gallery: Arizona Girl
Stats: 146/141/135 5'5"
WOE: Keeping the carbs low
|
I questioned her once and got slammed for questioning her. She was very condescending to me but why wouldn't she be when I questioned her authenticity? Anyway, I never bought into her "plan" which advocated NOT exercising, fasting and using laxatives. Although I have tried some of these extreme measures on my own, I do not advocate them. Anyway, I always thought there was something fishy. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 3,831
Gallery: jdprecious
Stats: (220 preg high) 199 after baby/162 now/150 goal
WOE: Moderate Low Carb
Start Date: Over and over since Jan 2003
|
im not sayin everyone is a hater on miss kimmer... but they are out there...
trust me i had my run ins with her too.. and she acted like i was making a mortal sin if i drank alcohol and lc'd at the same time... and i have seen her do her "holier than thou/ talk down" bit... but... im just sayin ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#234 | |
|
Random WIT
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: in the state of desperation
Posts: 48,610
Gallery: stews
Stats: 235/???/135 OR size 20-22/8-10/4-6
WOE: Learning2Lose with Jackie Brown
Start Date: 2/7/00, restarted 4/11/05
|
Quote:
I'm sure there are some out there, I wasn't saying there arent. I was just saying not to be so quick to those that have something against her that is is from jealousy. honestly, I think for most, it is from the way they were treated or saw her treat others, NOT from jealousy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 | |
|
Very Gabby LCF Member!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 3,831
Gallery: jdprecious
Stats: (220 preg high) 199 after baby/162 now/150 goal
WOE: Moderate Low Carb
Start Date: Over and over since Jan 2003
|
Quote:
yeah but is so fuuuun!!! :devil horns: (i wish they would make that smiley dangit!! ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#236 | |
|
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,343
Gallery: serenity_aus
Start Date: January 2004
|
It doesn't say SHES going on the cruise.
And who says she doesn't have qualifications? Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|