![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 649
Gallery: Melle's_Sweetheart
Stats: 330(319)/279/170 (21% bodyfat)
WOE: Kamikaze Atkin's
Start Date: Dec 1, 2003 (first time) May 28, 2007 (last time)
|
Question for KIMMER
Kimmer:
I keep reading the order in which the body loses weight in your signature line. Since dietary fat is burned before stored fat, wouldn't it make sense to follow Atkin's with as little fat as possible or am I interpreting it wrong? I want to learn more about this so I can tweak my WOE accordingly, but I don't even know where to look. Can you either explain it or direct me to some past posts? Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta,Georgia
Posts: 203
Gallery: alexsinn
Stats: 230/220/140
WOE: KE
Start Date: 6/4/2007
|
I am not Kimmer, however, fat is the only thing that CANNOT be turned into glucose and effect insuline levels. That, I think, is the reason for the fat fast for the meatbolic resistant.
The quickest way to lose is cut out all fats and carbs and do strictly protein which is highly ketogenic. 1-2 cups of salad veggies will not hurt. However, for every 5 grams you add back in you consequently slow down your loss. I am sure Kimmer can add many more details as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 649
Gallery: Melle's_Sweetheart
Stats: 330(319)/279/170 (21% bodyfat)
WOE: Kamikaze Atkin's
Start Date: Dec 1, 2003 (first time) May 28, 2007 (last time)
|
That was always my understanding, but in her signature line, Kimmer states that dietary is the last thing to be burned before stored fat. If that's true, then it would make sense to eat LESS fat so that your body can get to burning your stored fat quicker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta,Georgia
Posts: 203
Gallery: alexsinn
Stats: 230/220/140
WOE: KE
Start Date: 6/4/2007
|
that would be true if you were not eating anything else. If you are burning alcohol, the carbs and protein and fat are being stored as fat, if you are burning carbs, the protein and fat are being stored as fat, if you are burning protein, the fat is being stored as fat. If you are eating few calories with mostly fat and little protein ( fat fast ) nothing is being stored and you have a shortage which must come from the fat cells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 641
Gallery: maskd
Stats: 210/208/175
WOE: My Own Thing
Start Date: Oct 05, Restart July 07
|
Lol alex I think I should mention that theres a little button on the bottom of all the posts called edit, saves you making all the posts
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Way too much time on my hands!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: California
Posts: 19,133
Gallery: Kimmer
Stats: 318/118/125
WOE: Kimkins
|
Dietary fat is the last thing to be burned because it take the most work ... but it's not impossible (anyone who's overweight can attest to that!)
Dr. Atkins original book states that focusing mostly on fat & protein produces the quickest weight loss partly due to a metabolic advantage, but also due to appetite suppression. For superior weight loss, following lower fat (calories) is the way to go. Check any of the protein-type challenges going on, including Stillman's, Kimmer Experiment, M/E, Protein Only ... and, of course, the fastest loss is water fasting. I think the wording in Dr. Atkins' original book is misleading. People tend to believe that eating fat is either a "free" food or that it will actually cause weight loss! False. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 649
Gallery: Melle's_Sweetheart
Stats: 330(319)/279/170 (21% bodyfat)
WOE: Kamikaze Atkin's
Start Date: Dec 1, 2003 (first time) May 28, 2007 (last time)
|
Quote:
I'm confused now. Last edited by Melle's_Sweetheart : 11-07-2005 at 07:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior LCF Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OVER THE RAINBOW
Posts: 799
Gallery: Snapdragon
Stats: 225/180/140
WOE: ATKINS '72 - Couch to 5k
|
To a point, calorie counting is unnecessary. If you weigh 300 pounds and go on induction per Atkins, the weight will come off, and quickly too. However, the lower your weight drops, the more you have to pay attention to your caloric intake.
There are individuals here who are close to goal, who HAVE to watch how many calories they eat in order to lose those last few pounds. In order to lose weight closer to goal, your caloric output must be more than your caloric intake. This is the way of the world. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|