Low Carb Friends  
Netrition.com - Chat - Reviews - Faces - Recipes - eCards - Home


Go Back   Low Carb Friends > Health Support Groups > Diabetes
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2008, 09:44 PM   #1
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
AnDee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Deepest NJ
Posts: 2,660
Gallery: AnDee
Stats: 218/183/up 199.6/196 (again)...185... down to...?
WOE: Uncomplicated LC
Start Date: Oct. 18, 2004
Study about Eggs/Men with Diabetes

[COLOR="Navy"]I just saw this report and had to post it. I'd love to hear what my egg-loving lc'ers have to say?

Signed, Anne (not a man, but boy, do I eat eggs! )
[/COLOR]

Egg Consumption Poses Risks for Diabetic Men: Study By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter
Thu Apr 10, 7:02 PM ET

THURSDAY, April 10 (HealthDay News) -- A new study suggests that consuming more than six eggs a week seems to raise the risk of dying from all causes.

And diabetics seem to face an even higher mortality risk, according to the study that was limited to men.

"The more eggs diabetic men consumed, the more they increased their risk for death," said study lead author Dr. Luc Djousse, an associate epidemiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital and an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School in Boston.


Djousse and his team analyzed egg consumption and mortality data among more than 21,000 men who had participated in a Physician's Health Study that explored heart disease and cancer prevention among American male doctors.


Participants ranged in age from 40 to 86. Over an average of 20 years, all the doctors completed annual written questionnaires on daily egg consumption, stroke and heart attack incidence, diabetes status, cholesterol levels, alcohol and smoking habits, and general dietary information.


On average, the physicians were found to have consumed one egg a week -- a rate the study authors termed "relatively low."


Overall, egg consumption wasn't found to be associated with heart attack or stroke risk. And consumption of up to six eggs a week also wasn't found to be associated with a higher risk of death from all causes. But eating seven or more eggs a week among healthy study participants was linked to a 23 percent higher risk of death.


Even more striking was the finding that mortality risk was much higher among those doctors with diabetes. Consuming seven or more eggs a week doubled their risk of death from all causes, compared with diabetic doctors who ate just one egg each week.


The findings were published in the April issue of The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.


Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and elevated LDL ("bad") cholesterol is a prime risk factor for cardiovascular trouble. And while eggs are rich in cholesterol -- and circulating cholesterol is related to the risk of cardiovascular disease -- the relationship between dietary cholesterol and blood cholesterol is complex. Some studies have suggested that dietary cholesterol doesn't affect blood cholesterol levels in many people, but it may in other individuals, such as those with diabetes, the researchers noted.


A single egg contains about 200 milligrams of cholesterol -- just 100 milligrams shy of the daily limit advocated for those at risk for heart disease, the researchers added.


On the other hand, eggs are a source of minerals, folate, B vitamins, protein and monounsaturated fats -- all of which have the potential to lower overall risk.


To explain the finding on diabetic men, the researchers theorized that diabetics might somehow convert dietary cholesterol more readily into blood cholesterol than people without diabetes.


"We need additional data to confirm these findings, so it's kind of premature to advise against egg consumption until we have more information," Djousse said.


Donald McNamara, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Egg Nutrition Center, said that while diabetics need to carefully assess all aspects of their diet, "no one food exists in isolation."


"And when we look at all the other studies that have been published, they show that easily an egg a day can fit into a healthy diet with no change in heart-disease risk for the average person and those with diabetes," McNamara added. "Eggs also provide some very important nutrients in terms of high quality protein and choline, which we know is insufficient in the diet today. So, you have to balance out the nutritional contribution of eggs in the diet relative to this kind of a study, which presents a very unique finding which has not been presented anywhere else, and has a lot of variables included that we don't know enough about."


In an accompanying editorial published in the journal, Dr. Robert H. Eckel, a professor of physiology and biophysics at the University of Colorado and co-chair of both the Cardiometabolic Health Congress and the Committee on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, echoed some of McNamara's comments and called for more research to validate the study findings.


"Eggs are like all other foods -- they are neither 'good' nor 'bad', and they can be part of an overall heart-healthy diet," Eckel said. But he suggested that those wary of the high cholesterol content in whole eggs might want to skip yolks in favor of egg whites, which are ripe with protein, riboflavin and selenium.

And Lona Sandon, a registered dietician and assistant professor of clinical nutrition at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, said that "the white part of the egg is the gold standard for protein."

"It contains all the essential immunoacids that your muscle needs for building," she said. "It's better than beef even. And it's one of the cheapest sources of protein as well. There are some good things in the yolk as well. But for someone who has had their cholesterol measured and found to have high LDL, the American Heart Association and the American Dietetic Association say watch your egg consumption, and try not to consume more than two yolks per week."
__________________
*** My past will not define my future! ***
.....Food is your fuel. Fuel is your friend!.....
AnDee is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 04-10-2008, 09:54 PM   #2
Fat Burning Machine Extraordinaire!
 
DiamondDeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 53,207
Gallery: DiamondDeb
I don't buy this.

Don't the organizations supporting this study also preach a low fat diet as healthy?
DiamondDeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 04:10 AM   #3
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
pbptm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 1,344
Gallery: pbptm
Stats: maintaining 112 lbs
WOE: zc
Start Date: 2003
I saw this yesterday and I'm sure it said that they also noted that many who died also didn't exercise and ate more veggies than others. I don't think you can take foods in isolation and blame them.After all it only took one silly politician over here to decimate the egg business back in the 80's with a salmonella comment. I have and will carry on eating raw eggs that I source from an organic free range farm. We kept chicken back the 60's when I was a child and my very knowledgeable granny used to say just wash off the poo from the shell and you'll be fine.
We were fed soft boiled yolk as a babys first solid food I did exactly the same with my 5 children.All the nutrients are in the yolk.
pbptm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM   #4
Way too much time on my hands!
 
pooticus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 16,016
Gallery: pooticus
Stats: 314/277.4/150
WOE: PersonalPlan
Start Date: Nov.20, 2007
Well I also notice that there is no mention on whether or not high glycemic carbs were eliminated. Now if these docs were following the standard ADA guidelines for diabetic eating, then the answer to that question is unequivically, no. They were still eating high carb diets.

I think it was a poorly designed study or at least a poorly designed data analysis. I don't think you can draw any conclusions as to what caused the increase in death. You could make it part of a profile for this group of dead guys but you can't make a causal connection. Not since this group was also generally overweight/obese, smoked, didn't exercise and drank. WTH? Right?
__________________
10.20.07 314/314/150;
11.26.07 Surgery - Total Hysterectomy
12.31.08 314/284.2/150
06.01.09 314/277.4/150
Join me on my journey at Weighty Matters and Straight Talk.
You can also read about what goes in mah belleh each day at Today I Ate A(n).
Also for carnivore fun come join us!!!
http://magicbus.myfreeforum.org/index.php
See ya there!
pooticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:32 AM   #5
Way too much time on my hands!
 
Rory8343's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 13,084
Blog Entries: 12
Gallery: Rory8343
Stats: 20W/16M/8
WOE: Atkins is the Man!
Start Date: January 2003 Start again November 2007
We pretty much ripped this one apart the other day. I have decided it is the number seven that is the problem.
Rory8343 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:38 AM   #6
Way too much time on my hands!
 
pooticus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 16,016
Gallery: pooticus
Stats: 314/277.4/150
WOE: PersonalPlan
Start Date: Nov.20, 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory8343 View Post
We pretty much ripped this one apart the other day. I have decided it is the number seven that is the problem.
bwahahahahahahahahaaha!!!! :birthda y:

I sure hope so cuz after reading that I did do the math and realize I eat 21 eggs minimum per week. (3egg breakfasts you know...)
pooticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:51 AM   #7
Old Wise One
 
jezzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hudson River Valley
Posts: 39,760
Blog Entries: 78
Gallery: jezzie
Stats: choosing to be scale-free;
WOE: YOU:on a Diet - Dr. Oz
Start Date: 05/22/07 - lightbulb; started YOU at 209.
I'm not sure I trust any study where the mice didn't die.

Or was it the other way around?

.
jezzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 06:03 AM   #8
MAJOR LCF POSTER!
 
pepperette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO.
Posts: 1,594
Gallery: pepperette
Stats: 268.8/235.8/145 wishful thinking
WOE: Low Carb only since 11/21/07
[COLOR="DarkGreen"]"That myth has been debunked by the LCFs!"[/COLOR]
pepperette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 08:18 AM   #9
Fat Burning Machine Extraordinaire!
 
DiamondDeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 53,207
Gallery: DiamondDeb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory8343 View Post
We pretty much ripped this one apart the other day. I have decided it is the number seven that is the problem.


I always suspected that "lucky number" rumor going around was a scam...
DiamondDeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Copyright ©1999-2009 Friends Forums LLC. All rights reserved. - Terms of Service | Privacy Policy